Proposal talk:Meadow orchard compromise
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
LandUSE
The tag is for the primary USE of the land ... if it is primarily for nature conservation .. then it should be tagged that way - not as an orchard nor meadow. Warin61 (talk) 21:49, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
- "Primarily for nature conservation" may or may not be the case. I personally know at least two: #1 has just "always been there" behind the pastor's house, probably belongs to the church as an institution. #2 is a section of a former meadow that was turned into a residential zone. This section has a little stream going through it, so they could not build houses there. Turning it into a proper park was either too expensive or deemed inappropriate for a little village like this, so they planted some trees and called it a romantic Streuobstwiese. Thing is: you probably won't see any difference between either of these two or one that is still there because of actual conservation efforts. I don't think that'S something we could map. --El Grafo (talk) 08:12, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
Orchard vs meadow
The tag landuse=orchard does not distinguish between the method of tree planting nor what exists between the trees. The tag landuse=meadow implies that there are no trees so, to me, is less suitable. Warin61 (talk) 21:49, 24 February 2017 (UTC)