Proposal talk:Path defined by

Initial responses to proposal

Please add a heading (level 3) and your comment below. Please sign your contributions.

Redundant?

This proposal seems to be redundant with existing tagging. The "full_construction"/"partial_construction"/"worn_line" distinction can be handled by the existing key:surface tag. The difference between "worn_line", "indistinct_worn_line", and "gap_in_vegetation" is covered by key:trail_visibility (and honestly, I'd tag all three examples of "indistinct_worn_line" as "worn_line" or "trail_visibility:excellent"). "animal_wear" usually isn't verifiable. This leaves only "route_markers" as something unique to this proposal. --Carnildo (talk) 20:38, 30 July 2019 (UTC)