Proposal talk:Residential Zoned Parking
How exactly would this be mapped?
The general idea of adding to the map is nice, but exactly are you going to map this? Just have a huge, closed way on the border? What if there are some exluced streets or non-governmental parkings, not affected by the zone? Would a multipolygon relation have to be used? With all this, wouldn't it almost be smarter to collect all affected streets in one big relation? We need some info here, please.
- Probably supposed to refer to the abandoned Proposed features/trafficzone. ---- Kovposch (talk) 19:27, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
Unclear comparison
- What does "renderers shall not map it as huge parking spaces" have to do with zone:parking=*?
- How and for what do you conclude "most of its attributes cannot be answered for a residential parking zone" (what does this mean anyway?) when zone:parking=* doesn't even have obvious documentation yet?
- If it's "more like a boundary", shouldn't you use boundary=* like boundary=low_emission_zone?
-- Kovposch (talk) 19:25, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
Self-explained inadequacy in relative flexibility
Extending to "non-residential areas when a local street's parking is reserved for a business, museum or other facility" would contradict {[tag|zone:resident_parking}} itself. There's nothing wrong with zone:parking=* overall. If there are multiple zones here, could sub-tag in eg zone:parking:resident=*.
If being more rigorous, the example photo doesn't show anything for resident. Only for "area" A "permit". So you are looking for something like zone:parking:permit=*. Proposed_features/access=permit#Permit_contact_information:_the_permit:*_keys is quite relevant for permit:*=*, although without having permit=* defined.
In general, there's already a lack of uniform standard in these attributes.
- zone:*=* is directly tied to the legal status (slightly similar to designation=*).
- In particular zone:maxspeed=* also overlaps with maxspeed:type=* and source:maxspeed=*.
- For the subject, zone:parking=* is originally for zone-based stopping restriction, as exmplified by zone:parking=DE:no_*. Following this format, yours would be eg zone:parking=resident + zone:parking:ref=*, or zone:parking=permit, etc.
- Proposed features/Parking lane conditionals has trouble with making parking:condition:*:residents=* work with the syntax of parking:condition:*:conditional=* without overwriting, and very long while unreadable plus umparsable parking:condition:*=tickets "*".
Making more competing standards is less helpful than cleaning them up. -- Kovposch (talk) 20:04, 24 December 2021 (UTC)