Proposal:Monitoring station

The Feature Page for this approved proposal is located at Tag:man_made=monitoring_station

monitoring station - Tag:man_made=monitoring_station
Proposal status:	Approved (active)
Proposed by:	Grossing, Delta foxtrot2, Malenki
Tagging:	man_made=monitoring_station Data item
Applies to:	, , ,
Definition:	For all objects measuring/monitoring sea-, river- or snow levels, air pollution, weather, seismic activity and so on
Statistics:
Rendered as:	free text
Draft started:	2010-05-20
RFC start:	2010-05-20
Vote start:	2013-10-30
Vote end:	2013-11-13

The content of this proposal has been archived to avoid confusion with the current version of the documentation.

View proposal content

Voting

• I approve this proposal. Since I worked on it I approve it, of course. :) -- malenki 23:04, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
• I approve this proposal. I'm glad you launched the vote as the situation with these two tags for the same thing is absurd. Time to choose one of them, this one looks good and if there's a consensus about it we will be able to fix this JOSM ticket by deprecating the older one. --Don-vip (talk) 01:28, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
• I approve this proposal. Thanks to Don-Vip for putting a note in josm bug tracker. Most of the time measurments are taken stationary and periodically, so I prefer monitoring since it indicates the progress made over time and for the simpler fact that its string is a little shorter, this matters esp. when it's used as a namespace prefix, like it is in this proposal. So I approve it over the other. --Cmuelle8 (talk) 01:55, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
• I approve this proposal. MHohmann (talk) 05:27, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
• I approve this proposal. Not a big thing, but a nice improvement. --EvanE (talk) 06:14, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
• I approve this proposal. Thanks for documentation and cleanup - that's always welcome. --Imagic (talk) 07:55, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
• I approve this proposal. Janko (talk) 10:03, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
• I approve this proposal. nice clean up and logical structure --Hedaja (talk) 11:54, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
• I approve this proposal. Logical structure N76 (talk) 14:59, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
• I approve this proposal. Thanks for your work on this --Escada (talk) 16:20, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
• I approve this proposal. Finally... --Hofoen (talk) 18:15, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
• I approve this proposal. Thanks for cleanup. --Werner2101 (talk) 18:17, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
• I approve this proposal. good cleanup --Farad (talk) 10:34, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
• I approve this proposal. --Lyx (talk) 23:30, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
• I approve this proposal. Bigfatfrog67 (talk) 18:32, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
• I approve this proposal. --M!dgard (talk) 20:09, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
• I approve this proposal. --Nebulon42 (talk) 10:47, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
• I approve this proposal. -- Al3xius (talk) 18:12, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
• I approve this proposal. -- HillWithSmallFields (talk) 15:32, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
• I approve this proposal. --vsandre (talk) 07:46, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
• I approve this proposal. --polderrunner (talk) 08:48, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
• I approve this proposal. -- Ogmios (talk) 09:00, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
• I approve this proposal. --Gormo (talk) 10:15, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
• I approve this proposal. --Species 10:35, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
• I approve this proposal. --4rch (talk) 13:23, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
• I approve this proposal. --Thomas8122 (talk) 15:42, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
• I approve this proposal. --ubahnverleih (talk) 16:22, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
• I approve this proposal. --Scai (talk) 21:07, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
• I approve this proposal. Makes sense --BCNorwich 9 November 2013
• I approve this proposal. --ToniE (talk) 16:04, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
• I approve this proposal. --msdess 11 November 2013
• I approve this proposal. --Dieterdreist (talk) 14:38, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
• I approve this proposal. --Brycenesbitt (talk) 07:24, 14 November 2013 (UTC)