Talk:Key:ref:wawa

Why use "ref:wawa" and not "ref=wawa"? --Reneman (talk) 15:51, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Following recommendation at Key:ref. If the number of ref values were a handful, I would have used "ref=wawa # XXX", but the potential number is in the couple of hundred, so I went with the sub-key. --Ceyockey (talk) 13:07, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Hello. Please add a real-example to your page: 1534569 1534569 or 123456789 123456789. The Link to TagInfo contains no results. --Reneman (talk) 13:26, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

The link to TagInfo contains no results because of the lag in updating the data. --Ceyockey (talk) 14:21, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Just noticed that TagInfo is now updated, showing two nodes and two ways. --Ceyockey (talk) 14:26, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for your great work :) . Why not use in the Template |group=references? see: Category:Keys:References. --Reneman (talk) 16:59, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

. --Reneman (talk) 16:50, 16 April 2013 (UTC)