Talk:Semi-colon value separator/Archive 1
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Jgpacker disruptive opinion based edits without arguments or talk at this page / tagging@ list
- [1][2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]
- I have no idea what this person trying to archive or fool someone. There plenty of link present to prove statements at this page. If there something missing, then missing parts should be added, not every single change should be reverted. Xxzme (talk) 10:36, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
- The discussion in the tagging list is still ongoing. You must not make such edits before reaching consensus. I was simply reverting them. The majority of people in the mailing list do not agree with your views. --Jgpacker (talk) 10:47, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
- Please settle the discussion before making extensive documentation changes, or else I'll ban both of you. --Dee Earley (talk) 10:50, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
- Hi, my changes were simply the reversion of documentation change; exactly because the discussion is still ongoing (mostly in the tagging mailing list). --Jgpacker (talk) 11:00, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
- Then you will ban wrong person. Discussion at tagging list was 115 messages long. No activity since my last message to the list. My last message should look like this. It was posted at 2015-01-25, I haven't seen reply to it for 2 days so I decided to make actual updates to wiki. Jgpacker doesn't like changes and wants to revert these edits without arguments. He did same thing at tagging list, now he wants to repeat this trick here. Not going to happen. Xxzme (talk) 11:02, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
- You're both edit waring. I don't care who's "in the right" at the moment. I can revert back to the state this morning until there is some form of consensus on the change. --Dee Earley (talk) 11:08, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
- Please settle the discussion before making extensive documentation changes, or else I'll ban both of you. --Dee Earley (talk) 10:50, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
- The discussion in the tagging list is still ongoing. You must not make such edits before reaching consensus. I was simply reverting them. The majority of people in the mailing list do not agree with your views. --Jgpacker (talk) 10:47, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
- Quote: "Then you will ban wrong person.". My opinion: I don't think so.
- Quote: "No activity since my last message to the list.". Maybe that's because you are simply ignored? This has - I'm just guessing - maybe something to do with lines like "Are you and idiot?" in many of your mails.
- I support a revert to the state this morning and I most definitively support a ban of Xxzme. --Imagic (talk) 11:30, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
- Pages have been reverted to Decemberish, and the semicolon page has been renamed back and protected for a week. Please sort yourselves out and introduce gradual changes if deemed necessary rather than wide sweeping changes to how the entire data set should be handled. Have a nice day. --Dee Earley (talk) 11:49, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
Sorry my original words seem to have caused a heated debate. I would be interested in any consensus emerging on the mailing list, but really it requires calmer discussion. On the wiki here too. This discussion is confrontational. The nice thing about wiki discussions, is that we can purge them onto an archive page. I suggest we do that with this discussion, so that we can take a breather, and then continue more calmly with "Avoid semi-colons?" below.
-- Harry Wood (talk) 17:11, 27 January 2015 (UTC)