User:MalgiK/Contact:website / website / url
Comparison of "contact:website / website / url" tagging and showing some pros and cons.
Taginfo
To illustrate how often each tag is used, here are the taginfo statistics for these different tags:
contact:website=* | website=* | url=* |
contact:phone=* | phone=* |
contact:email=* | email=* |
contact:fax=* | fax=* |
Notes & Advantages
All three tagings having equal rights.
There is an advantage of website=* and url=*: It's faster to use, because you don't have to type in so many letter, if you don't use any editor presets
There is an advantage of contact:website=*: For getting better/faster overview of tag arrangement which will be a kind of a group for namespace contact=*. This is similar which osm also used for addr=*. See following table for illustration.
email=* / fax=* / phone=* / website=* / (url=*) | contact=* |
building=yes (click "Run" button top left to show results) |
building=yes (click "Run" button top left to show results) |
So please decide by yourself which one you prefer.
Interpreter software should know all of them anyway.
See also
- Contact:website_/_website_/_url - latest version: comparison & overview of contact schemes/tags
- Gym_/_Fitness_centre - comparison & overview the distribution of gym and fitness tags
- Discussions/tagging/contact:phone_or_phone - 2019/11 rejected attempt to merge phone=* and contact:phone=* to only phone=*