User talk:Al.
→ /al
Github Link
scubbx/osm-at-flyer GitHub
Conf Icon
 |
this is a conference |
 |
this is a meeting |
 |
this is a mapping party |
| CONF | test |
 |
test |
|
test |
 |
test |
 |
test |
| MEET | test |
 |
test |
|
test |
| MAP | test |
 |
test |
|
test |
AGIT Versuch
|
AGIT conferences
|
Template Versuch
|
|
Linuxtage Graz
|
Linuxtage Graz
|
Linuxtage Graz
|
Gallery Versuch
17. Mai 2006
4. Juli 2006
12. Oktober 2007
26. Mai 2008
13. Dezember 2008
8. Jänner 2009
11. April 2009
13. September 2010
6. Dezember 2010
9. März 2012
6. November 2012
Subtable
| Termin | Raum | Vortragender | Titel | Video/Audio | Slides | Anmerkung | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mittwoch | ||||||||||||
| 2014-03-19 15:30 | HS3 | Martin Christen | 3D Visualisierung von OpenStreetMap Daten mit OpenWebGlobe |      |
748 | |||||||
| 2014-03-19 15:30 | HS3 | Martin Christen |
|
Highway Color
| Highway color |
|---|
| primary |
| secondary |
| tertiary |
| road (unset) |
Commons
Eigene Tracks anzeigen
- von Sven Geggus: http://geggus.net/gmaps/radtour-ausflug2008.shtml (böses[TM] API: http://geggus.net/gmaps/routeplanner.html)
- kleine Web-Anwendung von Sebastian Klemm: http://phpmygpx.tuxfamily.org/phpmygpx.php
OpenLayers selbst machen
- Track-Sample: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Openlayers_Track_example
- Beispiel von Sven Geggus: http://geggus.net/gmaps/ka-hd.html
Kontakt Example
→ Kontakt bitte direkt: lab.at
Andreas_Labres
@al_0
openstreetmap.at
Using OpenStreetMap/Map examples
Hallo Al,
Applications_of_OpenStreetMap#Maps verlinkt schon zu verschiedenen Seiten, die Beispiel-Karten auflisten. Ein entsprechender Link zu Applications_of_OpenStreetMap findet sich auch schon in der Einleitung von Using OpenStreetMap. Wärst du einverstanden, die von dir neu angelegte Seite Using OpenStreetMap/Map examples wieder zu löschen, den entsprechenden Link aus Using OpenStreetMap wieder rauszunehmen und stattdessen die zwei Links auf OSM_Online_Browsing und/ oder List of OSM based Services einzupflegen? (Falls sie da nicht schon draufstehn)
Viele Grüße --Cantho (talk) 16:31, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
Es geht mir um eine Auflistung von konkreten (größeren/wichtigeren) Beispielen von solchen gedruckten Informationstafeln/Aushangkarten. Dies sollte eine eigene Kategorie (eine eigene Seite) sein und eben nicht vermischt mit - welchen auch immer - "elektronischen" Karten (online oder offline). Es ist auch etwas anderes als Papierkarten (wo ich jetzt auch nicht wüßte, ob's dazu schon eine Auflistung gibt; von der Karte auf der FOSSGIS vor zig Jahren, von unserer Karte auf der SOTM-EU 2011, noch ein/zwei weitere Beispiele fallen mir da grade ein).
- Applications of OpenStreetMap soll in meinen Augen eine Übersicht sein, was man mit OSM Daten alles "anstellen" kann. Die seite ist nicht dazu geeignet, eine konkrete Auflistung von Beispielen zu geben (auch wenn das momentan nur zwei sind).
- Für Using OpenStreetMap gilt ähnliches, auf den ersten Blick sehe ich nicht, wieso es diese beiden getrennten Seiten gibt.
- OSM_Online_Browsing ist grundsätzlich falsch (weil online)
- List of OSM based Services ist jetzt schon so unübersichtlich, keine Ahnung, was da alles aufgelistet werden soll, hauptsächlich sind das wohl alles Webkarten
Summa summarum: Ich hab das alles durchgeschaut und bin zu der Erkenntnis gekommen, dass es eine Auflistung für gedruckte Karten noch nicht gibt, drum habe ich sie gemacht. Die Auflistung irgendwo anders "dazuzupicken" hielte ich nicht für eine Verbesserung.
Ich weiß zumindest noch eine dritte Anwendung, wo ich gelegentlich den Ersteller fragen will, ob er ein Foto davon hat. Wenn die Liste irgendwann länger wird, würde es mich freuen...
Ciao! /al 20:35, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
- ok, jetzt verstehe ich. Eine Seite mit Beispielen von Informationstafeln finde ich gut. Applications of OpenStreetMap hatte ich neu erstellt, die Abgrenzung von Using OpenStreetMap ist, dass letztere eine Übersichtsseite zu HowTos/ technischen Anleitungen ist, während erstere die Bandbreite der Anwendung von OSM darstellt. Die Seite zu Informationstafeln wäre aus meiner Sicht dann in Applications of OpenStreetMap zu verlinken. Wärst du damit einverstanden? Außerdem würde ich konkreter verlinken, z.B. 'information boards' statt 'usage examples'. Die Seite sollte man dann auch verschieben, z.B. zu einer eigenständigen Seite Information boards with OpenStreetMap. Viele Grüße --Cantho (talk) 09:16, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
Missing file information
Hello! And thanks for your upload - but some extra info is necessary.
Sorry for bothering you about this, but it is important to know source of the uploaded files.
Are you the author of image File:EI EG.png ?
Or is it copied from some other place (which one?)?
Please, add this info to the file page - something like "I took this photo" or "downloaded from -website link-" or "I took this screeshot of program XYZ".
Doing this would be already very useful.
Licensing - photos
In case that you are the author of the image: Would you agree to open licensing of this image, allowing its use by anyone (similarly to your OSM edits)?
In case where it is a photo you (except relatively rare cases) author can make it available under a specific free license.
Would you be OK with CC0 (it allows use without attribution or any other requirement)?
Or do you prefer to require attribution and some other things using CC-BY-SA-4.0?
If you are the author: Please add {{CC0-self}} to the file page to publish the image under CC0 license.
You can also use {{CC-BY-SA-4.0-self}} to publish under CC-BY-SA-4.0 license.
Once you add missing data - please remove {{Unknown|subcategory=uploader notified February 2022}} from the file page.
Licensing - other images
If it is not a photo situation gets a bit more complicated.
See Drafts/Media file license chart that may help.
note: if you took screenshot of program made by someone else, screenshot of OSM editor with aerial imagery: then licensing of that elements also matter and you are not a sole author.
note: If you downloaded image made by someone else then you are NOT the author.
Note that in cases where photo is a screenshot of some software interface: usually it is needed to handle also copyright of software itself.
Note that in cases where aerial imagery is present: also licensing of an aerial imagery matter.
Help
Feel free to ask for help if you need it - you can do it for example by asking on Talk:Wiki: new topic.
Please ask there if you are not sure what is the proper next step. Especially when you are uploading files that are not your own work or are derivative work (screenshots, composition of images, using aerial imagery etc).
If you are interested in wider discussion about handling licencing at OSM Wiki, see this thread.
--Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 06:39, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
Missing file information
Hello! And thanks for your upload - but some extra info is necessary.
Sorry for bothering you about this, but it is important to know source of the uploaded files.
Are you the creator of image File:Festsaal Grundriss.png ?
Or is it copied from some other place (which one?)?
Please, add this info to the file page - something like "I took this photo" or "downloaded from -website link-" or "I took this screeshot of program XYZ" or "this is map generated from OpenStreetMap data and SRTM data" or "map generated from OSM data and only OSM data" or "This is my work based on file -link-to-page-with-that-file-and-its-licensing-info-" or "used file downloaded from internet to create it, no idea which one".
Doing this would be already very useful.
Licensing - photos
In case that you are the author of the image: Would you agree to open licensing of this image, allowing its use by anyone (similarly to your OSM edits)?
In case where it is a photo you (except relatively rare cases) author can make it available under a specific free license.
Would you be OK with CC0 (it allows use without attribution or any other requirement)?
Or do you prefer to require attribution and some other things using CC-BY-SA-4.0?
If you are the author: Please add {{CC0-self}} to the file page to publish the image under CC0 license.
You can also use {{CC-BY-SA-4.0-self|Al.}} to publish under CC-BY-SA-4.0 license.
Once you add missing data - please remove {{Unknown|subcategory=uploader notified March 2022}} from the file page.
Licensing - other images
If it is not a photo situation gets a bit more complicated.
See Drafts/Media file license chart that may help.
note: if you took screenshot of program made by someone else, screenshot of OSM editor with aerial imagery: then licensing of that elements also matter and you are not a sole author.
note: If you downloaded image made by someone else then you are NOT the author.
Note that in cases where photo is a screenshot of some software interface: usually it is needed to handle also copyright of software itself.
Note that in cases where aerial imagery is present: also licensing of an aerial imagery matter.
Help
Feel free to ask for help if you need it - you can do it for example by asking on Talk:Wiki: new topic.
Please ask there if you are not sure what is the proper next step. Especially when you are uploading files that are not your own work or are derivative work (screenshots, composition of images, using aerial imagery etc).
If you are interested in wider discussion about handling licencing at OSM Wiki, see this thread.
(sorry if I missed something that already states license and source: I am looking through over 20 000 files and fixing obvious cases on my own, in other I ask people who upladed files, but it is possible that I missed something - in such case also please answer)
--Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 21:03, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
License
Do you know what is the license of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:OSRM-Logo.png file which you uploaded? Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 16:16, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
Missing file information
Hello! And thanks for your upload - but some extra info is necessary.
Sorry for bothering you about this, but it is important to know source of the uploaded files.
Are you the creator of image File:Festsaal Foyer.jpg ?
Or is it copied from some other place (which one?)?
Please, add this info to the file page - something like "I took this photo" or "downloaded from -website link-" or "I took this screeshot of program XYZ" or "this is map generated from OpenStreetMap data and SRTM data" or "map generated from OSM data and only OSM data" or "This is my work based on file -link-to-page-with-that-file-and-its-licensing-info-" or "used file downloaded from internet to create it, no idea which one".
Doing this would be already very useful.
Licensing - photos
In case that you are the author of the image: Would you agree to open licensing of this image, allowing its use by anyone (similarly to your OSM edits)?
In case where it is a photo you have taken then you can make it available under a specific free license (except some cases, like photos of modern sculptures in coutries without freedom of panorama or taking photo of copyrighted artwork).
Would you be OK with CC0 (it allows use without attribution or any other requirement)?
Or do you prefer to require attribution and some other things using CC-BY-SA-4.0?
If you are the author: Please add {{CC0-self}} to the file page to publish the image under CC0 license.
You can also use {{CC-BY-SA-4.0-self|Al.}} to publish under CC-BY-SA-4.0 license.
Once you add missing data - please remove {{Unknown|subcategory=uploader notified 2022, August}} from the file page.
Licensing - other images
If it is not a photo situation gets a bit more complicated.
See Drafts/Media file license chart that may help.
note: if you took screenshot of program made by someone else, screenshot of OSM editor with aerial imagery: then licensing of that elements also matter and you are not a sole author.
note: If you downloaded image made by someone else then you are NOT the author.
Note that in cases where photo is a screenshot of some software interface: usually it is needed to handle also copyright of software itself.
Note that in cases where aerial imagery is present: also licensing of an aerial imagery matter.
Help
Feel free to ask for help if you need it - you can do it for example by asking on Talk:Wiki: new topic.
Please ask there if you are not sure what is the proper next step. Especially when you are uploading files that are not your own work or are derivative work (screenshots, composition of images, using aerial imagery etc).
If you are interested in wider discussion about handling licencing at OSM Wiki, see this thread.
(sorry if I missed something that already states license and source: I am looking through over 20 000 files and fixing obvious cases on my own, in other I ask people who upladed files, but it is possible that I missed something - in such case also please answer)
--Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 06:12, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
Missing file information
Hello! And thanks for your upload - but some extra info is necessary.
Sorry for bothering you about this, but it is important to know source of the uploaded files.
Are you the creator of image File:EI7.jpg ?
Or is it copied from some other place (which one?)?
Please, add this info to the file page - something like "I took this photo" or "downloaded from -website link-" or "I took this screeshot of program XYZ" or "this is map generated from OpenStreetMap data and SRTM data" or "map generated from OSM data and only OSM data" or "This is my work based on file -link-to-page-with-that-file-and-its-licensing-info-" or "used file downloaded from internet to create it, no idea which one".
Doing this would be already very useful.
Licensing - photos
In case that you are the author of the image: Would you agree to open licensing of this image, allowing its use by anyone (similarly to your OSM edits)?
In case where it is a photo you have taken then you can make it available under a specific free license (except some cases, like photos of modern sculptures in coutries without freedom of panorama or taking photo of copyrighted artwork).
Would you be OK with CC0 (it allows use without attribution or any other requirement)?
Or do you prefer to require attribution and some other things using CC-BY-SA-4.0?
If you are the author: Please add {{CC0-self}} to the file page to publish the image under CC0 license.
You can also use {{CC-BY-SA-4.0-self|Al.}} to publish under CC-BY-SA-4.0 license.
Once you add missing data - please remove {{Unknown|subcategory=uploader notified 2022, September}} from the file page.
Licensing - other images
If it is not a photo situation gets a bit more complicated.
See Drafts/Media file license chart that may help.
note: if you took screenshot of program made by someone else, screenshot of OSM editor with aerial imagery: then licensing of that elements also matter and you are not a sole author.
note: If you downloaded image made by someone else then you are NOT the author.
Note that in cases where photo is a screenshot of some software interface: usually it is needed to handle also copyright of software itself.
Note that in cases where aerial imagery is present: also licensing of an aerial imagery matter.
Help
Feel free to ask for help if you need it - you can do it for example by asking on Talk:Wiki: new topic.
Please ask there if you are not sure what is the proper next step. Especially when you are uploading files that are not your own work or are derivative work (screenshots, composition of images, using aerial imagery etc).
If you are interested in wider discussion about handling licencing at OSM Wiki, see this thread.
(sorry if I missed something that already states license and source: I am looking through over 20 000 files and fixing obvious cases on my own, in other I ask people who upladed files, but it is possible that I missed something - in such case also please answer)
--Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 13:52, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Are you author
Have you made https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:BusIcon.png icon? Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 13:51, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Missing file information
Hello! And thanks for your upload - but some extra info is necessary.
Sorry for bothering you about this, but it is important to know source of the uploaded files.
Are you the creator of image File:EI10.jpg ?
Or is it copied from some other place (which one?)?
Please, add this info to the file page - something like "I took this photo" or "downloaded from -website link-" or "I took this screeshot of program XYZ" or "this is map generated from OpenStreetMap data and SRTM data" or "map generated from OSM data and only OSM data" or "This is my work based on file -link-to-page-with-that-file-and-its-licensing-info-" or "used file downloaded from internet to create it, no idea which one".
Doing this would be already very useful.
Licensing - photos
In case that you are the author of the image: Would you agree to open licensing of this image, allowing its use by anyone (similarly to your OSM edits)?
In case where it is a photo you have taken then you can make it available under a specific free license (except some cases, like photos of modern sculptures in coutries without freedom of panorama or taking photo of copyrighted artwork).
Would you be OK with CC0 (it allows use without attribution or any other requirement)?
Or do you prefer to require attribution and some other things using CC-BY-SA-4.0?
If you are the author: Please add {{CC0-self}} to the file page to publish the image under CC0 license.
You can also use {{CC-BY-SA-4.0-self|Al.}} to publish under CC-BY-SA-4.0 license.
Once you add missing data - please remove {{Unknown|subcategory=uploader notified 2022, November}} from the file page.
Licensing - other images
If it is not a photo situation gets a bit more complicated.
See Drafts/Media file license chart that may help.
note: if you took screenshot of program made by someone else, screenshot of OSM editor with aerial imagery: then licensing of that elements also matter and you are not a sole author.
note: If you downloaded image made by someone else then you are NOT the author.
Note that in cases where photo is a screenshot of some software interface: usually it is needed to handle also copyright of software itself.
Note that in cases where aerial imagery is present: also licensing of an aerial imagery matter.
Help
Feel free to ask for help if you need it - you can do it for example by asking on Talk:Wiki: new topic.
Please ask there if you are not sure what is the proper next step. Especially when you are uploading files that are not your own work or are derivative work (screenshots, composition of images, using aerial imagery etc).
If you are interested in wider discussion about handling licencing at OSM Wiki, see this thread.
(sorry if I missed something that already states license and source: I am looking through over 20 000 files and fixing obvious cases on my own, in other I ask people who upladed files, but it is possible that I missed something - in such case also please answer)
--Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 19:43, 23 November 2022 (UTC)