User talk:Helmut Kauer
Willkommen im OSM-Wiki
Hallo Helmut, willkommen hier! Kannst du bitte unter deinen Diskussionsbeitrag auf DE talk:Key:agricultural noch deinen Namen und Uhrzeit setzen? Das geht automatisch, indem du --~~~~ hinschreibst (oder per Klick auf das Signaturicon in der Werkzeugleiste über dem Bearbeitungstextfeld) und dann speicherst. --Aseerel4c26 (talk) 19:53, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
Genau so, sehr gut! --Aseerel4c26 (talk) 20:46, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
- Danke, hätte ich eigendlich dran denken sollen.--Helmut Kauer (talk) 21:03, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
Und jetzt habe ich dir bei DE talk:Key:agricultural geantwortet (nur als Hinweis, falls du die Beobachtungsfunktion hier noch nicht kennst). --Aseerel4c26 (talk) 22:49, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Danke. --Helmut Kauer (talk) 23:09, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
Hydropower waterways voting feedback
I oppose this proposal. There is no tag for pumped storage hydro power station. --Helmut Kauer (talk) 10:56, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
- Hi, Thank you for your feedback on the Hydropower waterway facilities.
- I don't understand it. Have you read Proposed_features/Hydropower_water_supplies#Pumped-storage_power_plants ?
- What additional tags would you need regarding pumping power plants? Fanfouer (talk) 13:08, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
usage=transmission
Hi,
I can see that you have voted for Proposed_features/Hydropower_water_supplies.
I have a problem with the tag usage=transmission, I'm new on the wiki and I don't know where to have answers.
On the wiki page, this tag has the status approved. But the definition of this tag on the wiki seems quite different of the informations about the transmission that we can find in the proposed features.
- transmission on the Proposed features looks like a way to transport water from a place to another one on a short distance (if you look at the drawing at the top of the page, transmission is used for water under a hill as a free flow or a pipe flow). In the text of the page, almost nothing explains this tag.
- transmission on the wiki page are "paths lead fluids or goods (...) to map large infrastructure moving important amounts on long distances".
Seems quite different to me : "goods" ? "long distance" ? For me, the definition for "transmission" looks a lot like the definition for "usage=main" on this page usage=* (if we forget that it talks only about railways). 2 tags for the same thing ? If you look at the history for this key, on 18 March 2018, there was nothing about transmission on this page.
The vote end was 18 March 2018 and the first version of the wiki page for the tag transmission was made on 28 March 2018 : are you agree to say that this tag was approved as it is written on the wiki page ?
Maybe there is also a problem with the tag usage=distribution (on the page usage=*) : seems to me that the tag usage=branch could fit (if we also forget that it talks only about railway).
Best regards.
Fred73000 (talk) 18:17, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
- Dear @Fred73000:, can you start this discussion in Talk:Tag:usage=transmission please? I'll be pleased to answer you there. THanks Fanfouer (talk) 21:55, 22 January 2022 (UTC)