User talk:Hotelsierra

From OpenStreetMap Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hallo HotelSierra, mich würde interessieren, ob du eine Lösung für Kneipp´sche Wassertretbecken gefunden hast.

Jan Mathys 19:06, 9 June 2010 (UTC)


Derzeit verwende ich die Kombination natural=water; name=Tretbecken; description=Kneipp'sches Tretbecken. Ich habe noch keinen passenden Tag für kleine künstliche Wasserbecken, die keinen wasserwirtschaftlichen Zweck erfüllen (basin, reservoir), bzw kein Brunnen oder Schwimmbecken sind, gefunden.

--Hotelsierra 06:27, 29 June 2010 (UTC)


Hallo, ich würde gerne auch Kneipp-Anlagen / Wassertretbecken in der OSM ergänzen. Einige bereits in der OSM vorhanden Anlagen haben leisure=water_park und name=kneipanalage (o.ä) was ich eigentlich besser finde, vorallem weil natural ja gründsätzlich falsch für von Menschen errichtete Anlagen ist. Was haltet Ihr davon?

--joglo 10:56, 8 July 2010 (UTC)


Hi, ist zwar schon ne Weile her, aber inzwischen scheint sich amenity=kneipp_water_cure mit fast 100 Nutzungen zu etablieren. Gegebenenfalls kann man noch eine note=Kneipp-Becken o.ä. dranhängen.

--es_ka 20:14, 15 August 2012 (BST)

Missing file information

Hello! And thanks for your upload - but some extra info is necessary.

Sorry for bothering you about this, but it is important to know source of the uploaded files.

Are you the author of image File:Boot2014 EingangNord.JPG ?

Or is it copied from some other place (which one?)?

Please, add this info to the file page - something like "I took this photo" or "downloaded from -website link-" or "I took this screeshot of program XYZ".

Doing this would be already very useful.

Licensing - photos

In case that you are the author of the image: Would you agree to open licensing of this image, allowing its use by anyone (similarly to your OSM edits)?

In case where it is a photo you (except relatively rare cases) author can make it available under a specific free license.

Would you be OK with CC0 (it allows use without attribution or any other requirement)?

Or do you prefer to require attribution and some other things using CC-BY-SA-4.0?

If you are the author: Please add {{CC0-self}} to the file page to publish the image under CC0 license.

You can also use {{CC-BY-SA-4.0-self}} to publish under CC-BY-SA-4.0 license.

Once you add missing data - please remove {{Unknown|subcategory=uploader notified January 2022}} from the file page.

Licensing - other images

If it is not a photo situation gets a bit more complicated.

See Drafts/Media file license chart that may help.

note: if you took screenshot of program made by someone else, screenshot of OSM editor with aerial imagery: then licensing of that elements also matter and you are not a sole author.

note: If you downloaded image made by someone else then you are NOT the author.

Note that in cases where photo is a screenshot of some software interface: usually it is needed to handle also copyright of software itself.

Note that in cases where aerial imagery is present: also licensing of an aerial imagery matter.

Help

Feel free to ask for help if you need it - you can do it for example by asking on Talk:Wiki: new topic.

Please ask there if you are not sure what is the proper next step. Especially when you are uploading files that are not your own work or are derivative work (screenshots, composition of images, using aerial imagery etc).

If you are interested in wider discussion about handling licencing at OSM Wiki, see this thread.

--Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 21:23, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Attribution

Hello! And sorry for bothering you, but descriptions of files you uploaded need to be improved.

You have uploaded files which are licensed as requiring attribution. But right now attribution is not specified properly.

Please, ask for help if something is confusing or unclear in this message.

Please, fix that problem with this uploads - note that images with unclear licensing situation may be deleted.

Attribution may be missing completely or just be specified in nonstandard way, in either case it needs to be improved. Note that using CC-BY files without specifying attribution is a copyright violation, which is often unethical and unwanted. So clearly specifying required attribution is needed if license which makes attribution mandatory was used.

If it is applying to your own work which not based on work by others - then you can select own user name or some other preferred attribution or even change license to for example {{CC0-self}}

For your own work: ensure that it is clearly stated at file page that you created image/took the photo/etc

For works by others - please ensure that there is link to the original source which confirms license and that you used proper attribution, or that source is clearly stated in some other way.

Especially for old OSM-baded maps, made from data before license change on 12 September 2012 you should use "map data © OpenStreetMap contributors" as at least part of attribution

For old OSM Carto maps, which predate license change on 12 September 2012 you can use a special template {{OSM Carto screenshot||old_license}}