User talk:Lübeck
Garmin Tipps
Ein Satz bei dir ist etwas durcheinander geraten: Ist ein Track voll, dann schaltet wird der Track gelöscht oder überschrieben--plaicy 10:33, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
Danke --Jan Tappenbeck 14:20, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
SearchNoNamePOI
Welche Tags sollten noch mit ausgewertet werden?
Hallo Jan, gratulation. Das sieht ja wirklich schon toll aus. Hier meine Wunschliste:
- Die URL: http://www.tappenbeck.net/osm/quality/poi_noname/hamburg/ geht nicht, obwohl du diese in einer Mail genannt hast, aber über die Wiki-Seite bin ich draum gekommen.
- Einen Marker auf den Bildern wo das Objekt ist
- Unterstützung des Karlsruher Schmeas, also Anzeige von PLZ, Straße, Hausnummer, Ort und eine ähnliche Statisik für Objekte wo diese fehlen.
- Eine Liste mit richtig benannten Objekten, damit man einfacher Ungereimtheiten ausräumen kann (Die Bank heißt einmal Haspa und einmal Hamburger Sparkasse). Sortiert nach Name.
- Quellcode, möglichst ins OSM-SVN
Gruß Sven
Hallo Sven (Anders?),
- URL wurde verschoben auf [1]
- Marker - muss ich mich erkundigen ob das mit den genutzten Bausteinen geht
- Karlsruher Schema - hat sich auch schon ein anderer gewünscht - müssen wir ansonsten beim nächsten Stammtisch (Juni) nochmal darüber sprechen.
- Eine Liste mit richtig benannten Objekten, .... verstehe ich noch nicht ganz -> Stammtisch
- SVN .... wenn ich etwas den Code aufgeräumt habe kann das losgehen.
Gruß Jan
U37 / 44
Hallo Jan, die beiden Umleitungen findste du in den Listen bei der A7 in Hamburg AS 25!. Diese AS ist ja sehr ortsnah zur AS21 der A23 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Germany/Bedarfsumleitung/Hamburg#A_7 Habe die Relationslinks nach Hamburg übertragen. Evtl. noch ein Hinweis an der A23? --Langläufer 09:58, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Tablet PC
Featured_image_proposals#Mobile_editing_with_JOSM - Ojw 08:59, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
- 101 MT? oder T101 MT? --goldfndr 16:36, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
Straßenliste Emden
Hallo "Lübeck", ich kümmere mich bei OSM um den Bereich Ostfriesland. Bei der Straßenliste von Emden gäbe es Abgleichbedarf. Könntest Du mir mitteilen, von welcher Kontaktperson Du diese erhalten hast? Damit hier keine Mailadressen im Wiki auftauchen, könntest Du gegebenenfalls die "Mail an diesen Benutzer" Funktion auf meiner Userseite benutzen. Ich sage schon einmal Danke für eine Reaktion. Gruß -- Tirkon 02:20, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
Matrix software
I like the screenshot image showing the Matrix for Haiti : File:Osm-matrix.jpg Is there a wiki page about the Matrix software in general? I know the same or similar status tracking software was used in Oberfaltz. Would be good to document the software separately somewhere and link that from the Quality Assurance page -- Harry Wood 11:44, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
Karte Energieerzeugung in OpenStreetMap (Deutschland)
Hallo,
schöne Karte! Könntest Du noch Wasserkraftwerke ergänzen (power_source=hydro)? wäre schön Viele Grüße okilimu
- sollte morgen mit der nächsten Auswertung zur Verfügung stehen. --Jan Tappenbeck 12:55, 24 September 2010 (BST)
POTM Tourismus
Hi Jan, ist deine Statistik nur für Deutschland? Wie bist du mit Richard verblieben wer die Statistik für das gesamte aktuelle POTM macht? --!i! 21:03, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
Xmas 2011
ist es nicht langsam Zeit die Xmas Karte wieder zu reaktivieren? :-) Danke. --Zuse 09:21, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
Energieerzeugung
Östlich von Wien stehen im Marchfeld viele Windkraftwerke, leider sind sie in deiner Karte nicht ersichtlich (z.b.: hier http://www.tappenbeck.net/osm/maps/deu/index.php?id=1019&zoom=16&lat=48.33901&lon=16.69727&layers=BFFFFFFFFFFT&lang=de) Ich konnte aber keine Unterschiede bei den Tags zu vorhandenen erkennen. Danke --Jimmy K 14:54, 13 June 2012 (BST)
drain & ditch
Moin ... ich weiß, dass die Behandlung von Wasserläufen bei uns bisher ziemlich konfus geregelt ist (drain, ditch, stream). Aber dass ein drain in einen ditch fließt, passt meiner Meinung nach eher nicht. Ditch ist meiner Meinung nach so ziemlich die kleinste Einheit und kann auch völlig trocken fallen - eine Klassifizierung kann man gut über die Breite vornehmen. Drain scheint mir etwas zu sein, was es vor allem in Küstennähe gibt, oder? Ich habe den Text bei ditch mal geändert - falls du nicht einverstanden bist, du hast freie Hand, es zurückzuändern oder auch weiter zu verbessern :-) Es wäre schön, da mal Klarheit reinzubringen, meine Zeit für so etwas ist jedoch leider sehr knapp. Grüße, -- Schusch 09:30, 29 August 2012 (BST)
Archäologie-Karte
Hallo Lübeck,
wie aufwändig ist ein Update der Archäologie-POIs auf http://www.tappenbeck.net/osm/maps/deu/index.php?id=1015 und wenn "nicht sehr", könntest du dann eins machen?
Vielen Dank und viele Grüße, --Gormo (talk) 12:47, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
PS: Außerdem kriege ich die Fehlermeldung "Error loading CSV file "../script/csv.phtml?db=archaeologie/osm_arch_chamber&lon.ge=9.1&lon.lt=9.3&lat.ge=52.3&lat.lt=52.7": not a CSV file", wenn ich auf Zoomstufe 10 oder größer die Karte angucke. --Gormo (talk) 12:55, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
AED map
Hi, If I understand correctly, you are the author of the special map for AED's ([2]). Are you aware that we currently have a validation process running for the tag "emergency=aed" ? A ["vote"] has been opened some days ago and revealed a strong opposition about using unusual abbreviations. The 2nd vote shows that it would probably imply a change in the tag value - from "aed" to "defibrillator" probably (but the vote is not closed yet). Do you see a problem if, in a first stage, your map should support a 3rd tag (once it will be official) ? And later, I could run some edit session to make all POI's consistent with the adopted tag. Do you know other data consumers using this AED data in OSM ? --Pieren (talk) 08:31, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
Hallo Lübeck,
zuerst mal ein großes Dankeschön für die Themen-Karten!
Mir ist gerade aufgefallen, dass Defibrillatoren bei uns im Ort von der Karte verschwunden sind. Beispiel: OSM Knoten 1682128977
Andererseits wird einer in der Nähe mit genau dem gleichen Tag emergency=defibrillator korrekt angezeigt: OSM-Knoten 2508812983
Viele Grüße aus Österreich!
Wanderer (talk) 20:46, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
Relation: NSG Grönauer Heide, Grönauer Moor und Blankensee (136134)
Moin, ich habe gesehen, dass die Karte des NSG von der der Verordnung beigefügten Karte abweicht. Das NSG ist grösser und umfasst den ganzen See. Könntest du das ändern? Gruss --Concord (talk) 15:21, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Overpass turbo feature request
Hi! Bevor du dich wunderst: Ich habe gerade einen "wish" von der overpass turbo wikiseite auf die entsprechende Diskussions-Seite verschoben. Siehe hier: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Overpass_turbo#Smartphone_optimize_css --Tyr (talk) 13:32, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
?-Feature
Hi Lübeck, schau mal, ob dir das so gefällt. Oder meinst du, dass es ein extra Abschnitt sein sollte? --Aseerel4c26 (talk) 16:42, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
OpenStreetMap 11th Anniversary Birthday party
I see you have an event scheduled for a couple of days before. Want to list it as the Lubeck 11th birthday party? Feel free to add details to the wiki page (London is looking a bit lonely on there so far) -- Harry Wood (talk) 17:29, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
archäologische Tags
Wir sind gerade dabei alle Tags die mit historic=archaeological_site zu tun haben im Wiki zu beschreiben. In diesem Zusammenhang bin ich auf deine Archäologische Karte gestoßen. Oben steht Letztes POI-Update: 22. Mar 2015. Könnte man das mal aktualisieren? Bei der Beschreibung bin ich auf die Begriffe Großsteingrab und Dolmen gestoßen. Beide haben einen tag. megalith_type=grosssteingrab fällt auf, weil es kein englischer Ausdruck ist. Ich wüsste aber gerne den Unterschied, dann könnten wir beides besser beschreiben.--geozeisig (talk) 08:33, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
- Moin! Danke für das Interesse - aber bitte verwende die historische Karte von OSM. Meine Karte pflege ich nicht weiter. Die Zeit hat diese erledigt. Muss ich einmal abschalten und entsprechend verweisen. --Lübeck (talk) 06:17, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
- Moin Jan, der Server hat jetzt neues PHP und daher kann die Karte keine Daten mehr abfragen: "Fatal error: Uncaught Error: Call to undefined function split() in /homepages/.../csv.phtml:166". Wäre super, wenn du die Karte entweder mit einem Hinweis versehen oder (so schade es ist!) abschalten könntest. Ich hatte vorhin vergeblich nach dem Problem gesucht. :} --HannesHH (talk) 19:57, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
Moin aus dem Norden
Mir wurde gesagt, das du dieses Foto von mir:
als Meilenstein in der Karte
http://gk.historic.place/historische_objekte/index.html
eingetragen hast.
Das ist falsch. Es ist ein Ergebnis des "Kalten Krieges" wie dieses Bild:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Schleswig-Holstein,_Itzehoe,_Heimatwegweiser_NIK_7304.JPG
Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 20:22, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
Moin! das sehe ich in Teile etwas anders. Meilenangabe ware richtig und der "Kalte Krieg" ist hoffentlich dauerhaft Geschichte und damit historisch. Heute wird keiner mehr diese Steine aufstellen. --Lübeck (talk) 04:48, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
Eintragungen in den Kalender
Hey!
Bei den Lübecker Treffen ist wohl einiges durcheinandergeraten [3]. Ich habe versucht das ein wenig zu entwirren. Generell sind Mapper-Treffen keine „großen“ Einträge im Kalender. Ich habe jetzt mal alles so verschoben, wie ich es für richtig halte. Ich hoffe, dass das so okay ist. Die Termine werden etwa einen bis anderthalb Monate im Voraus auf der Hauptseite des Wikis angezeigt, sie sind also erst einmal von dort wieder verschwunden, sind aber nicht gelöscht und tauchen dann rechtzeitig wieder auf. --Tigerfell 
(Let's talk) 21:14, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
Missing file information
Hello! And thanks for your upload - but some extra info is necessary.
Sorry for bothering you about this, but it is important to know source of the uploaded files.
Are you the author of image File:Car parts.png ?
Or is it copied from some other place (which one?)?
Please, add this info to the file page - something like "I took this photo" or "downloaded from -website link-" or "I took this screeshot of program XYZ".
Doing this would be already very useful.
Licensing - photos
In case that you are the author of the image: Would you agree to open licensing of this image, allowing its use by anyone (similarly to your OSM edits)?
In case where it is a photo you (except relatively rare cases) author can make it available under a specific free license.
Would you be OK with CC0 (it allows use without attribution or any other requirement)?
Or do you prefer to require attribution and some other things using CC-BY-SA-4.0?
If you are the author: Please add {{CC0-self}} to the file page to publish the image under CC0 license.
You can also use {{CC-BY-SA-4.0-self}} to publish under CC-BY-SA-4.0 license.
Once you add missing data - please remove {{Unknown|subcategory=uploader notified February 2022}} from the file page.
Licensing - other images
If it is not a photo situation gets a bit more complicated.
See Drafts/Media file license chart that may help.
note: if you took screenshot of program made by someone else, screenshot of OSM editor with aerial imagery: then licensing of that elements also matter and you are not a sole author.
note: If you downloaded image made by someone else then you are NOT the author.
Note that in cases where photo is a screenshot of some software interface: usually it is needed to handle also copyright of software itself.
Note that in cases where aerial imagery is present: also licensing of an aerial imagery matter.
Help
Feel free to ask for help if you need it - you can do it for example by asking on Talk:Wiki: new topic.
Please ask there if you are not sure what is the proper next step. Especially when you are uploading files that are not your own work or are derivative work (screenshots, composition of images, using aerial imagery etc).
If you are interested in wider discussion about handling licencing at OSM Wiki, see this thread.
--Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 23:50, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
Missing file information
Hello! And thanks for your upload - but some extra info is necessary.
Sorry for bothering you about this, but it is important to know source of the uploaded files.
Are you the creator of image File:Jt kosmos maxspeed.jpg ?
Or is it copied from some other place (which one?)?
Please, add this info to the file page - something like "I took this photo" or "downloaded from -website link-" or "I took this screeshot of program XYZ" or "this is map generated from OpenStreetMap data and SRTM data" or "map generated from OSM data and only OSM data" or "This is my work based on file -link-to-page-with-that-file-and-its-licensing-info-" or "used file downloaded from internet to create it, no idea which one".
Doing this would be already very useful.
Licensing - photos
In case that you are the author of the image: Would you agree to open licensing of this image, allowing its use by anyone (similarly to your OSM edits)?
In case where it is a photo you (except relatively rare cases) author can make it available under a specific free license.
Would you be OK with CC0 (it allows use without attribution or any other requirement)?
Or do you prefer to require attribution and some other things using CC-BY-SA-4.0?
If you are the author: Please add {{CC0-self}} to the file page to publish the image under CC0 license.
You can also use {{CC-BY-SA-4.0-self}} to publish under CC-BY-SA-4.0 license.
Once you add missing data - please remove {{Unknown|subcategory=uploader notified March 2022}} from the file page.
Licensing - other images
If it is not a photo situation gets a bit more complicated.
See Drafts/Media file license chart that may help.
note: if you took screenshot of program made by someone else, screenshot of OSM editor with aerial imagery: then licensing of that elements also matter and you are not a sole author.
note: If you downloaded image made by someone else then you are NOT the author.
Note that in cases where photo is a screenshot of some software interface: usually it is needed to handle also copyright of software itself.
Note that in cases where aerial imagery is present: also licensing of an aerial imagery matter.
Help
Feel free to ask for help if you need it - you can do it for example by asking on Talk:Wiki: new topic.
Please ask there if you are not sure what is the proper next step. Especially when you are uploading files that are not your own work or are derivative work (screenshots, composition of images, using aerial imagery etc).
If you are interested in wider discussion about handling licencing at OSM Wiki, see this thread.
(sorry if I missed something that already states license and source: I am looking through over 20 000 files and fixing obvious cases on my own, in other I ask people who upladed files, but it is possible that I missed something - in such case also please answer)
--Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 13:36, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry, but i did not know anything about the source - it is a lon time ago! --Lübeck (talk) 15:50, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
Missing file information
Hello! And thanks for your upload - but some extra info is necessary.
Sorry for bothering you about this, but it is important to know source of the uploaded files.
Are you the creator of image File:MoellnTour3.jpg ?
Or is it copied from some other place (which one?)?
Please, add this info to the file page - something like "I took this photo" or "downloaded from -website link-" or "I took this screeshot of program XYZ" or "this is map generated from OpenStreetMap data and SRTM data" or "map generated from OSM data and only OSM data" or "This is my work based on file -link-to-page-with-that-file-and-its-licensing-info-" or "used file downloaded from internet to create it, no idea which one".
Doing this would be already very useful.
Licensing - photos
In case that you are the author of the image: Would you agree to open licensing of this image, allowing its use by anyone (similarly to your OSM edits)?
In case where it is a photo you (except relatively rare cases) author can make it available under a specific free license.
Would you be OK with CC0 (it allows use without attribution or any other requirement)?
Or do you prefer to require attribution and some other things using CC-BY-SA-4.0?
If you are the author: Please add {{CC0-self}} to the file page to publish the image under CC0 license.
You can also use {{CC-BY-SA-4.0-self|Lübeck}} to publish under CC-BY-SA-4.0 license.
Once you add missing data - please remove {{Unknown|subcategory=uploader notified 2022, May}} from the file page.
Licensing - other images
If it is not a photo situation gets a bit more complicated.
See Drafts/Media file license chart that may help.
note: if you took screenshot of program made by someone else, screenshot of OSM editor with aerial imagery: then licensing of that elements also matter and you are not a sole author.
note: If you downloaded image made by someone else then you are NOT the author.
Note that in cases where photo is a screenshot of some software interface: usually it is needed to handle also copyright of software itself.
Note that in cases where aerial imagery is present: also licensing of an aerial imagery matter.
Help
Feel free to ask for help if you need it - you can do it for example by asking on Talk:Wiki: new topic.
Please ask there if you are not sure what is the proper next step. Especially when you are uploading files that are not your own work or are derivative work (screenshots, composition of images, using aerial imagery etc).
If you are interested in wider discussion about handling licencing at OSM Wiki, see this thread.
(sorry if I missed something that already states license and source: I am looking through over 20 000 files and fixing obvious cases on my own, in other I ask people who upladed files, but it is possible that I missed something - in such case also please answer)
--Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 21:03, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry, but i did not know anything about the source - it is a lon time ago! --Lübeck (talk) 15:50, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
Missing file information
Hello! And thanks for your upload - but some extra info is necessary.
Sorry for bothering you about this, but it is important to know source of the uploaded files.
Are you the creator of image File:North sea cycle route.jpg ?
Or is it copied from some other place (which one?)?
Please, add this info to the file page - something like "I took this photo" or "downloaded from -website link-" or "I took this screeshot of program XYZ" or "this is map generated from OpenStreetMap data and SRTM data" or "map generated from OSM data and only OSM data" or "This is my work based on file -link-to-page-with-that-file-and-its-licensing-info-" or "used file downloaded from internet to create it, no idea which one".
Doing this would be already very useful.
Licensing - photos
In case that you are the author of the image: Would you agree to open licensing of this image, allowing its use by anyone (similarly to your OSM edits)?
In case where it is a photo you have taken then you can make it available under a specific free license (except some cases, like photos of modern sculptures in coutries without freedom of panorama or taking photo of copyrighted artwork).
Would you be OK with CC0 (it allows use without attribution or any other requirement)?
Or do you prefer to require attribution and some other things using CC-BY-SA-4.0?
If you are the author: Please add {{CC0-self}} to the file page to publish the image under CC0 license.
You can also use {{CC-BY-SA-4.0-self|Lübeck}} to publish under CC-BY-SA-4.0 license.
Once you add missing data - please remove {{Unknown|subcategory=uploader notified 2022, June}} from the file page.
Licensing - other images
If it is not a photo situation gets a bit more complicated.
See Drafts/Media file license chart that may help.
note: if you took screenshot of program made by someone else, screenshot of OSM editor with aerial imagery: then licensing of that elements also matter and you are not a sole author.
note: If you downloaded image made by someone else then you are NOT the author.
Note that in cases where photo is a screenshot of some software interface: usually it is needed to handle also copyright of software itself.
Note that in cases where aerial imagery is present: also licensing of an aerial imagery matter.
Help
Feel free to ask for help if you need it - you can do it for example by asking on Talk:Wiki: new topic.
Please ask there if you are not sure what is the proper next step. Especially when you are uploading files that are not your own work or are derivative work (screenshots, composition of images, using aerial imagery etc).
If you are interested in wider discussion about handling licencing at OSM Wiki, see this thread.
(sorry if I missed something that already states license and source: I am looking through over 20 000 files and fixing obvious cases on my own, in other I ask people who upladed files, but it is possible that I missed something - in such case also please answer)
--Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 21:05, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry, but i did not know anything about the source - it is a lon time ago! --Lübeck (talk) 15:50, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
Missing file information
Hello! And thanks for your upload - but some extra info is necessary.
Sorry for bothering you about this, but it is important to know source of the uploaded files.
Are you the creator of image File:MoellnTour4.jpg ?
Or is it copied from some other place (which one?)?
Please, add this info to the file page - something like "I took this photo" or "downloaded from -website link-" or "I took this screeshot of program XYZ" or "this is map generated from OpenStreetMap data and SRTM data" or "map generated from OSM data and only OSM data" or "This is my work based on file -link-to-page-with-that-file-and-its-licensing-info-" or "used file downloaded from internet to create it, no idea which one".
Doing this would be already very useful.
Licensing - photos
In case that you are the author of the image: Would you agree to open licensing of this image, allowing its use by anyone (similarly to your OSM edits)?
In case where it is a photo you have taken then you can make it available under a specific free license (except some cases, like photos of modern sculptures in coutries without freedom of panorama or taking photo of copyrighted artwork).
Would you be OK with CC0 (it allows use without attribution or any other requirement)?
Or do you prefer to require attribution and some other things using CC-BY-SA-4.0?
If you are the author: Please add {{CC0-self}} to the file page to publish the image under CC0 license.
You can also use {{CC-BY-SA-4.0-self|Lübeck}} to publish under CC-BY-SA-4.0 license.
Once you add missing data - please remove {{Unknown|subcategory=uploader notified 2022, August}} from the file page.
Licensing - other images
If it is not a photo situation gets a bit more complicated.
See Drafts/Media file license chart that may help.
note: if you took screenshot of program made by someone else, screenshot of OSM editor with aerial imagery: then licensing of that elements also matter and you are not a sole author.
note: If you downloaded image made by someone else then you are NOT the author.
Note that in cases where photo is a screenshot of some software interface: usually it is needed to handle also copyright of software itself.
Note that in cases where aerial imagery is present: also licensing of an aerial imagery matter.
Help
Feel free to ask for help if you need it - you can do it for example by asking on Talk:Wiki: new topic.
Please ask there if you are not sure what is the proper next step. Especially when you are uploading files that are not your own work or are derivative work (screenshots, composition of images, using aerial imagery etc).
If you are interested in wider discussion about handling licencing at OSM Wiki, see this thread.
(sorry if I missed something that already states license and source: I am looking through over 20 000 files and fixing obvious cases on my own, in other I ask people who upladed files, but it is possible that I missed something - in such case also please answer)
--Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 18:22, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Licensing
What is depicted on https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:MoellnTour2.jpg ? It looks like a logo of some route - in such case, are you author of the original logo or just redrawing it? Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 09:54, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Missing file information
Hello! And thanks for your upload - but some extra info is necessary.
Sorry for bothering you about this, but it is important to know source of the uploaded files.
Are you the creator of image File:Eq camping.png ?
Or is it copied from some other place (which one?)?
Please, add this info to the file page - something like "I took this photo" or "downloaded from -website link-" or "I took this screeshot of program XYZ" or "this is map generated from OpenStreetMap data and SRTM data" or "map generated from OSM data and only OSM data" or "This is my work based on file -link-to-page-with-that-file-and-its-licensing-info-" or "used file downloaded from internet to create it, no idea which one".
Doing this would be already very useful.
Licensing - photos
In case that you are the author of the image: Would you agree to open licensing of this image, allowing its use by anyone (similarly to your OSM edits)?
In case where it is a photo you have taken then you can make it available under a specific free license (except some cases, like photos of modern sculptures in coutries without freedom of panorama or taking photo of copyrighted artwork).
Would you be OK with CC0 (it allows use without attribution or any other requirement)?
Or do you prefer to require attribution and some other things using CC-BY-SA-4.0?
If you are the author: Please add {{CC0-self}} to the file page to publish the image under CC0 license.
You can also use {{CC-BY-SA-4.0-self|Lübeck}} to publish under CC-BY-SA-4.0 license.
Once you add missing data - please remove {{Unknown|subcategory=uploader notified 2022, August}} from the file page.
Licensing - other images
If it is not a photo situation gets a bit more complicated.
See Drafts/Media file license chart that may help.
note: if you took screenshot of program made by someone else, screenshot of OSM editor with aerial imagery: then licensing of that elements also matter and you are not a sole author.
note: If you downloaded image made by someone else then you are NOT the author.
Note that in cases where photo is a screenshot of some software interface: usually it is needed to handle also copyright of software itself.
Note that in cases where aerial imagery is present: also licensing of an aerial imagery matter.
Help
Feel free to ask for help if you need it - you can do it for example by asking on Talk:Wiki: new topic.
Please ask there if you are not sure what is the proper next step. Especially when you are uploading files that are not your own work or are derivative work (screenshots, composition of images, using aerial imagery etc).
If you are interested in wider discussion about handling licencing at OSM Wiki, see this thread.
(sorry if I missed something that already states license and source: I am looking through over 20 000 files and fixing obvious cases on my own, in other I ask people who upladed files, but it is possible that I missed something - in such case also please answer)
--Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 07:36, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
Missing file information
Hello! And thanks for your upload - but some extra info is necessary.
Sorry for bothering you about this, but it is important to know source of the uploaded files.
Are you the creator of image File:Ostseekuestenradweg.jpg ?
Or is it copied from some other place (which one?)?
Please, add this info to the file page - something like "I took this photo" or "downloaded from -website link-" or "I took this screeshot of program XYZ" or "this is map generated from OpenStreetMap data and SRTM data" or "map generated from OSM data and only OSM data" or "This is my work based on file -link-to-page-with-that-file-and-its-licensing-info-" or "used file downloaded from internet to create it, no idea which one".
Doing this would be already very useful.
Licensing - photos
In case that you are the author of the image: Would you agree to open licensing of this image, allowing its use by anyone (similarly to your OSM edits)?
In case where it is a photo you have taken then you can make it available under a specific free license (except some cases, like photos of modern sculptures in coutries without freedom of panorama or taking photo of copyrighted artwork).
Would you be OK with CC0 (it allows use without attribution or any other requirement)?
Or do you prefer to require attribution and some other things using CC-BY-SA-4.0?
If you are the author: Please add {{CC0-self}} to the file page to publish the image under CC0 license.
You can also use {{CC-BY-SA-4.0-self|Lübeck}} to publish under CC-BY-SA-4.0 license.
Once you add missing data - please remove {{Unknown|subcategory=uploader notified 2022, September}} from the file page.
Licensing - other images
If it is not a photo situation gets a bit more complicated.
See Drafts/Media file license chart that may help.
note: if you took screenshot of program made by someone else, screenshot of OSM editor with aerial imagery: then licensing of that elements also matter and you are not a sole author.
note: If you downloaded image made by someone else then you are NOT the author.
Note that in cases where photo is a screenshot of some software interface: usually it is needed to handle also copyright of software itself.
Note that in cases where aerial imagery is present: also licensing of an aerial imagery matter.
Help
Feel free to ask for help if you need it - you can do it for example by asking on Talk:Wiki: new topic.
Please ask there if you are not sure what is the proper next step. Especially when you are uploading files that are not your own work or are derivative work (screenshots, composition of images, using aerial imagery etc).
If you are interested in wider discussion about handling licencing at OSM Wiki, see this thread.
(sorry if I missed something that already states license and source: I am looking through over 20 000 files and fixing obvious cases on my own, in other I ask people who upladed files, but it is possible that I missed something - in such case also please answer)
--Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 20:04, 24 September 2022 (UTC), i will add informations, when i have time. current less time! please purge this site and reduce to one... --Lübeck (talk) 19:56, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Attribution
Hello! And sorry for bothering you, but descriptions of files you uploaded need to be improved.
You have uploaded files which are licensed as requiring attribution. But right now attribution is not specified properly.
Please, ask for help if something is confusing or unclear in this message.
Please, fix that problem with this uploads - note that images with unclear licensing situation may be deleted.
Attribution may be missing completely or just be specified in nonstandard way, in either case it needs to be improved. Note that using CC-BY files without specifying attribution is a copyright violation, which is often unethical and unwanted. So clearly specifying required attribution is needed if license which makes attribution mandatory was used.
If it is applying to your own work which not based on work by others - then you can select own user name or some other preferred attribution or even change license to for example {{CC0-self}}
For files which are solely your own work: ensure that it is clearly stated at file page that you created image/took the photo/etc
For works by others - please ensure that there is link to the original source which confirms license and that you used proper attribution, or that source is clearly stated in some other way. This applies when you took screeshot, made map from OSM data and so on.
Especially for old OSM-baded maps, made from data before license change on 12 September 2012 you should use "map data © OpenStreetMap contributors" as at least part of attribution
For old OSM Carto maps, which predate license change on 12 September 2012 you can use a special template {{OSM Carto screenshot||old_license}}
Note: Maybe the current license on this file is wrong and a different one should be used! Wiki:Media file license chart may be helpful. If unsure, ask on Talk:Wiki
- File:Jt feuerpfahl 20130504.jpg
- File:Jt osm party dassow 2013.jpg
- File:Jt bahnradwege.png
- File:E-scotter-parking-malaga.jpg
Missing file information
Hello! And thanks for your upload - but some extra info is necessary.
Sorry for bothering you about this, but it is important to know source of the uploaded files.
Are you the creator of image File:Nok route.jpg ?
Or is it copied from some other place (which one?)?
Please, add this info to the file page - something like "I took this photo" or "downloaded from -website link-" or "I took this screeshot of program XYZ" or "this is map generated from OpenStreetMap data and SRTM data" or "map generated from OSM data and only OSM data" or "This is my work based on file -link-to-page-with-that-file-and-its-licensing-info-" or "used file downloaded from internet to create it, no idea which one".
Doing this would be already very useful.
Licensing - photos
In case that you are the author of the image: Would you agree to open licensing of this image, allowing its use by anyone (similarly to your OSM edits)?
In case where it is a photo you have taken then you can make it available under a specific free license (except some cases, like photos of modern sculptures in coutries without freedom of panorama or taking photo of copyrighted artwork).
Would you be OK with CC0 (it allows use without attribution or any other requirement)?
Or do you prefer to require attribution and some other things using CC-BY-SA-4.0?
If you are the author: Please add {{CC0-self}} to the file page to publish the image under CC0 license.
You can also use {{CC-BY-SA-4.0-self|Lübeck}} to publish under CC-BY-SA-4.0 license.
Once you add missing data - please remove {{Unknown|subcategory=uploader notified 2022, December}} from the file page.
Licensing - other images
If it is not a photo situation gets a bit more complicated.
See Drafts/Media file license chart that may help.
note: if you took screenshot of program made by someone else, screenshot of OSM editor with aerial imagery: then licensing of that elements also matter and you are not a sole author.
note: If you downloaded image made by someone else then you are NOT the author.
Note that in cases where photo is a screenshot of some software interface: usually it is needed to handle also copyright of software itself.
Note that in cases where aerial imagery is present: also licensing of an aerial imagery matter.
Help
Feel free to ask for help if you need it - you can do it for example by asking on Talk:Wiki: new topic.
Please ask there if you are not sure what is the proper next step. Especially when you are uploading files that are not your own work or are derivative work (screenshots, composition of images, using aerial imagery etc).
If you are interested in wider discussion about handling licencing at OSM Wiki, see this thread.
(sorry if I missed something that already states license and source: I am looking through over 20 000 files and fixing obvious cases on my own, in other I ask people who upladed files, but it is possible that I missed something - in such case also please answer)
--Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 13:54, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
Unterseite JosmPresent
Hallo Lübeck,
deine Unterseite beschreibt eine Objektvorlage. Ich vermute, du meinst Preset (=Vorlage) und nicht Present (=Gegenwart, Geschenk). Ich hätte es ja gerne auf der Unterseite geändert, aber da sich dann auch der Name der Unterseite ändern würde, könnte das Auswirkung auf andere Unterseiten und Verweise haben. Das war mir zu riskant. Da hast du sicher den besseren Überblick.
Grüsse aus dem Süden
--KlausDieterSchmitt (talk) 18:35, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
Moin! ich weiß zwar nicht welche Seite Du meinst - kannst Du aber machen. Benenne die Seite doch einfach um und lasse eine Weiterleitung erstellen. Dann passen auch alles Links weiterhin.