User talk:Ljbouere

Création tag "audio_loop" pour boucle d'induction auditive

Bonjour, sur Lyon je connais une malentendante qui souhaite aussi taguer les boucles d'induction. En recherchant dans le wiki je n'ai pas trouvé de tag adapté, aussi ta proposition audio_loop me semble très intéressante, mais il faudrait peut-etre en parler sur la liste de diffusion "accessibility " pour officialiser ce tag (voire le renommer?) et le généraliser, car c'est la page anglaise qui fait référence dans le wiki ! Pour en reparler éventuellement. Gnrc69 (talk) 10:08, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Bonjour, je ne sais pas bien si c'est ici que je dois répondre. Nous travaillons sur la question de l'accessibilité sur le territoire de Brest Métropole et nous allons bientôt sur d'autres territoires en Bretagne et notamment Lyon, Bordeaux... Nous travaillons en fonction des retours d'usages des participants à nos cartoparties, formations sur le terrain. Il y a de nombreux manques et notre objectif est notamment d'affiner les map features autour de ces questions pour tout le monde. Avant de le proposer à la communauté il faut qu'on soit plus avancé que ça. Après audio_loop il y a aussi electric_wheelchair qui nous semble pertinent. Dans Brest par exemple 90% des fauteuils sont électriques et le tag wheelchair ne fonctionne pas bien. Mais tu as raison sur la page du wiki en français il faudrait qu'on indique ce qui est en cours de testà prendre avec des pincettes. A Orange, JL Zimmermann test pas mal de choses aussi. J'espère que d'ici un an on pourra soumettre une nomenclature aboutie autour de ces questions. Au plaisir d'échanger avec toi sur le sujet.

Merci pour ta réponse, si vous montez un groupe d’échange (mailing list, etc.) sur l'harmonisation de ces tags je suis intéressé. Le 28/04 j'ai une rencontre avec le Grand-Lyon qui veut développer quelque chose pour la ville (pas forcement avec OSM :-( ), et cette harmonisation/étoffement nous mettrait en avant. Gnrc69 (talk) 10:25, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Missing file information

Hello! And thanks for your upload - but some extra info is necessary.

Sorry for bothering you about this, but it is important to know source of the uploaded files.

Are you the author of image File:Logo-handicapmoteur.jpg ?

Or is it copied from some other place (which one?)?

Please, add this info to the file page - something like "I took this photo" or "downloaded from -website link-" or "I took this screeshot of program XYZ" or "this is map generated from OpenStreetMap data and SRTM data" or "map generated from OSM data and only OSM data".

Doing this would be already very useful.

Licensing - photos

In case that you are the author of the image: Would you agree to open licensing of this image, allowing its use by anyone (similarly to your OSM edits)?

In case where it is a photo you (except relatively rare cases) author can make it available under a specific free license.

Would you be OK with CC0 (it allows use without attribution or any other requirement)?

Or do you prefer to require attribution and some other things using CC-BY-SA-4.0?

If you are the author: Please add {{CC0-self}} to the file page to publish the image under CC0 license.

You can also use {{CC-BY-SA-4.0-self}} to publish under CC-BY-SA-4.0 license.

Once you add missing data - please remove {{Unknown|subcategory=uploader notified March 2022}} from the file page.

Licensing - other images

If it is not a photo situation gets a bit more complicated.

See Drafts/Media file license chart that may help.

note: if you took screenshot of program made by someone else, screenshot of OSM editor with aerial imagery: then licensing of that elements also matter and you are not a sole author.

note: If you downloaded image made by someone else then you are NOT the author.

Note that in cases where photo is a screenshot of some software interface: usually it is needed to handle also copyright of software itself.

Note that in cases where aerial imagery is present: also licensing of an aerial imagery matter.

Help

Feel free to ask for help if you need it - you can do it for example by asking on Talk:Wiki: new topic.

Please ask there if you are not sure what is the proper next step. Especially when you are uploading files that are not your own work or are derivative work (screenshots, composition of images, using aerial imagery etc).

If you are interested in wider discussion about handling licencing at OSM Wiki, see this thread.

(sorry if I missed something that already states license and source: I am looking through over 20 000 files and fixing obvious cases on my own, in other I ask people who upladed files, but it is possible that I missed something - in such case also please answer)

--Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 09:31, 14 March 2022 (UTC)