User talk:Rade Berger
To add a signature use 4times tilde: Rade Berger (talk) 06:21, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
File:DDH Wegzeichen Hämmerchen aka Das harte T.jpg
Hallo, kennst du die folgende Seite: DE:Wiki Translation#Bilder im Wiki?
Daher würde ich mich sehr freuen, wenn du das o.g. Bild in der 
Category:Footpath signs in Dresdner Heide bei wikimedia commons hoch laden würdest. Wenn du Hilfe brauchst, meld dich. Danke & Gruß nach Radeberg aus Arnsdorf :) --Reneman (talk) 21:28, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
bbox DDH
N 51.144 E 13.912 W 13.760 S 51.062
OSM-query: W S E N
Overpass-QL: S W N E 51,062 13,76 51,144 13,912
Hämmerchen oder das harte T (T ohne Kreis)
Der Weg beginnt an der S95 im der FA 51 und verläuft je nach Quelle zum Türmchen an unterschiedlichen Stellen.
- Realität: mittlere Route (Kennzeichnung mit Wegzeichen) zum westlichen Punkt am Türmchen
- OSM-Map: im südlichen Teil zum östlichen Punkt, wurde inzwischen korrigiert: zum westl. Punkt
- M1: mittlere Route, der südliche Teil ist nicht näher bezeichnet: unklar, kein Wegzeichen
- M2: mittlere Route zum westlichen Punkt, entspricht der Realität, korrektes Wegzeichen
- M3/M4: mittlere Route, der südliche Teil ist nicht näher bezeichnet: unklar, falsches Wegzeichen: Tmit Kreis
Ein westlicher Weg, wie in M1-4, wurde von mir nur im südlichen Teil begangen, ging dann "verloren".
- Annahme: die derzeitigen Wegzeichen sind korrekt.
- Frage: kann das durch (ältere) Karten bestätigt werden?
Sonstiges (todo) Ändern der query Hämmerchen oder besser neue query für diesen Teil (Hämmerchen_T) Erledigt 20130709 Entfernen aus der Relation (87175), die vermutlich einen Wanderweg betrifft
Fehlende Fotos
- Alte Hetsche
- Alter Mühlweg ML
- Alte Zehn X
- Blümpenweg BW
- Fensterchen
- Halbmond
- Kellersteig
- Kreuzringel
- Kreuzstern
- Loschwitzer Weg
- Oberingel
- (PM) + MP
- Schwarzer Bildweg
- Steingründchenweg
- Steinweg
todo
Vergleich mit gallery ThomasKlosa, Konsistenz: Bilder aus Commons, Namensgebung DDHeide...
- vekehrte Gabel
sonstige Fragen
- Gebauter Kannhenkel + Kannhenkel: in der map überprüfen, historisch gibt es nur den Kannhenkel
- HB-Weg: Nachweis für Holzbrückenweg s. Ruttkowski
- Alte 4 und Stallweg, Stallweg war wohl der ursprüngliche Name? name="Alte 4 : Stallweg" ? oder anderes Trennzeichen?, nicht realisiert
- Wege ohne Zeichen
- Zweiter Hütungsweg, von der Hofewiese (129) Richtung Langebrücker Saugarten
Namenskonventionen
Zur eindeutigen Suche (query) nach bestimmten Kriterien (alle Schneisen, alle Wege beginnend mit "alte" etc) sind gewisse Konventionen erforderlich. Das gilt für die Bezeichnung der Wege in der Karte (name=), im freien Text nicht unbedingt erforderlich.
- Wege werden ohne Artikel eingetragen: Alte Zehn (nicht: die alte Zehn), Ausnahme: "Hämmerchen, das große T", "Die Blümpen"
- Wege mit einer Ziffer
- Beispiel: name=Alte 1, Kreuz 5, Krumme 9 (Teil1 - Leerzeichen - Ziffer)
- Vermeiden: Alte1, alte 1, Alte Eins u.ä.
- Ausnahmen: Alte Zehn, Zweienweg, Zweiter Hutungsweg, ...
- Korrigieren: Kreuzsieben -> Kreuz 7
- Schneisen
- Beispiel: name=1, 10, 20 (nur Ziffern ohne führende Nullen)
- möglicher alt_name=Schneise 1, etc.
- w/a union: (^[1-20]$ union ^Schneise.*)
- Flügel
- Beispiel: name=A, B, C, ... (nur ein Großbuchstabe)
- Korrigieren: Flügel nördlich der Radeberger Landstraße
- möglicher alt_name=A-Flügel (Großbuchstabe - Bindestrich - Flügel
- w/a umion: (^[A-H]$ union [A-H]-Flügel)
- Gemeinsames Teilstück zweier Wege
- "1 / Kreuzringel" "A / Nachtflügel" (Slash mit Leerzeichen, Reihenfolge beliebig)
- Gebräuchlicher Alias für einen gesamten Weg
- "Hämmerchen, das große T" "Alte 4, Stallweg" (evtl. ist Doppelpunkt besser ?), s.a. "O oder Todweg" (das Auge)
- Forstabteilung (falls realisiert)
- name=Zahl aus 1 - 3 Ziffern: 1,12, 134
- für query: alt_name=3 Ziffern mit führenden Nullen 001, 012, 134 oder FA 007 ?
Missing file information
Hello! And thanks for your upload - but some extra info is necessary.
Sorry for bothering you about this, but it is important to know source of the uploaded files.
Are you the creator of image File:GFP der Stein.jpg ?
Or is it copied from some other place (which one?)?
Please, add this info to the file page - something like "I took this photo" or "downloaded from -website link-" or "I took this screeshot of program XYZ" or "this is map generated from OpenStreetMap data and SRTM data" or "map generated from OSM data and only OSM data" or "This is my work based on file -link-to-page-with-that-file-and-its-licensing-info-" or "used file downloaded from internet to create it, no idea which one".
Doing this would be already very useful.
Licensing - photos
In case that you are the author of the image: Would you agree to open licensing of this image, allowing its use by anyone (similarly to your OSM edits)?
In case where it is a photo you (except relatively rare cases) author can make it available under a specific free license.
Would you be OK with CC0 (it allows use without attribution or any other requirement)?
Or do you prefer to require attribution and some other things using CC-BY-SA-4.0?
If you are the author: Please add {{CC0-self}} to the file page to publish the image under CC0 license.
You can also use {{CC-BY-SA-4.0-self|Rade Berger}} to publish under CC-BY-SA-4.0 license.
Once you add missing data - please remove {{Unknown|subcategory=uploader notified 2022, June}} from the file page.
Licensing - other images
If it is not a photo situation gets a bit more complicated.
See Drafts/Media file license chart that may help.
note: if you took screenshot of program made by someone else, screenshot of OSM editor with aerial imagery: then licensing of that elements also matter and you are not a sole author.
note: If you downloaded image made by someone else then you are NOT the author.
Note that in cases where photo is a screenshot of some software interface: usually it is needed to handle also copyright of software itself.
Note that in cases where aerial imagery is present: also licensing of an aerial imagery matter.
Help
Feel free to ask for help if you need it - you can do it for example by asking on Talk:Wiki: new topic.
Please ask there if you are not sure what is the proper next step. Especially when you are uploading files that are not your own work or are derivative work (screenshots, composition of images, using aerial imagery etc).
If you are interested in wider discussion about handling licencing at OSM Wiki, see this thread.
(sorry if I missed something that already states license and source: I am looking through over 20 000 files and fixing obvious cases on my own, in other I ask people who upladed files, but it is possible that I missed something - in such case also please answer)
--Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 19:29, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
Attribution
Hello! And sorry for bothering you, but descriptions of files you uploaded need to be improved.
You have uploaded files which are licensed as requiring attribution. But right now attribution is not specified properly.
Please, ask for help if something is confusing or unclear in this message.
Please, fix that problem with this uploads - note that images with unclear licensing situation may be deleted.
Attribution may be missing completely or just be specified in nonstandard way, in either case it needs to be improved. Note that using CC-BY files without specifying attribution is a copyright violation, which is often unethical and unwanted. So clearly specifying required attribution is needed if license which makes attribution mandatory was used.
If it is applying to your own work which not based on work by others - then you can select own user name or some other preferred attribution or even change license to for example {{CC0-self}}
For files which are solely your own work: ensure that it is clearly stated at file page that you created image/took the photo/etc
For works by others - please ensure that there is link to the original source which confirms license and that you used proper attribution, or that source is clearly stated in some other way. This applies when you took screeshot, made map from OSM data and so on.
Especially for old OSM-baded maps, made from data before license change on 12 September 2012 you should use "map data © OpenStreetMap contributors" as at least part of attribution
For old OSM Carto maps, which predate license change on 12 September 2012 you can use a special template {{OSM Carto screenshot||old_license}}
Note: Maybe the current license on this file is wrong and a different one should be used! Wiki:Media file license chart may be helpful. If unsure, ask on Talk:Wiki
