User talk:Starkreiten

Low_water_crossings and culverts and bridges -- oh my!

20181112

 Ok, so I like ford:yes with the common node plan.
 +: Easy, simple, quick, doesn't break the ways.
 +: Fixes JOSM validator way/water crossings.
 ?: Rendering?-- we don't map for that.

 ?'s: add flood_prone=yes?
   ?: used with ford:yes as node?
   ?: implied for ford?
   ?: recommended for bridge=lwc

 ?'s: bridge=low_water_crossing
   +: wiki recommended
   -: taginfo isn't really loving it.
   +: bridge is roadway vs waterway -- a LWC is roadway and waterway
   -: roadway split needed

 ?'s: tunnel=culvert
   +: no issues with wiki
   +: waterway vs roadway
   +: taginfo supported
   -: waterway split needed

  ?: tunnel vs bridge vs ford
   ?: tunnel takes something through something (ie... waterway through the road) -- bridge takes something over something (ie... roadway over the water/gorge/highway/etc...) Same difference? Doesn't seem like it.
   ?: low_water_crossing is a path for both roadway and waterway -- equals a ford? I like it.