Talk:Key:moved

Is there general agreement that something with "moved=yes" has to be mapped at its current location (i.e. where it was moved TO), and not at the original location (i.e. where it was moved FROM)? If so, I'd make that clear(er) on the page. --Woodpeck (talk) 11:04, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

I think that the answer is yes. For example, if something (building, megalith, boundary stone, ...) has been moved from its original location to a different place (museum, ...), then this tag makes sense for the current location (in the museum, ...). For the original site, I would consider adding the prefix removed:* to any existing tags and a note that says where structure has been moved to, but I wouldn't start mapping it there if no tags exist and there's nothing left that can be seen. Of course, if the foundations or other parts are still visible, then a different tag (maybe ruins:* or razed:*?) might make more sense for the original site. --Biff (talk) 10:58, 30 May 2023 (UTC)