Talk:Tag:company=construction

image

@Yunan973: Hi! Regarding the image for the description box: I think it doesn't matter if the construction company builds roads or not. It is a construction company anyway. The office tower on your new image (File:Vinci_headquarters_at_Nanterre_-_2021-07-11.jpg) has nothing to distinguish it from any office of whatever company. That is what I was looking for when searching for a suitable description image and was happy to found that one (File:Globál construction company site, 2018 Győr.jpg). I would keep on the previous image. May I get your acceptance? --Chris2map (talk) 15:37, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

Maybe related Talk:Tag:office=construction_company#Untitled  ?
—— Kovposch (talk) 04:45, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

OK, I see definitions are quite unclear and may vary in different countries as well as the terms of different construction disciplines are hard to translate. In Germany there (still) are many smaller companies that do everything, structural works, road works and all the civil stuff, at least with smaller projects. – Back to the image topic: Hard to describe that with an image. Though the office tower is better than a company logo. That means OK. --Chris2map (talk) 09:06, 10 August 2024 (UTC)

useless ?

how usefull/useless is office=company + company=construction compared to office=construction ? are we willing do to a chain linking that add no meaning ? we don't link 2 tags office=company + company=the_value for the other values, we go straight to office=the_value Marc marc (talk)