Template talk:No proposal
Discuss Template:No proposal here:
Too big
The nature of this template, and it's implications on the tagging debate are such that it will really annoy a few people. To lessen this, and just for general cosmetic reasons, I think this we need to reduce the size and prominence of the template.
Also the polling card graphic implies that a proposal is all about voting. (Not true. The primary purpose of a proposal is discussion and agreement)
-- Harry Wood 22:33, 2 September 2010 (BST)
there better approach, statuslink in Template:Description
Parameter statuslink is not used right now for some reason. We can provide link to proposal and if it is absent and then display KeyDescription/ValueDescription using different color or with warning Xxzme (talk) 13:33, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
Confused about this template
"no proposal but is listed in the Map features list and lacks of one of the following reasons:" - in such case it should be removed from map features, not templated. Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 13:07, 7 May 2020 (UTC)