User talk:Hakuch
Verschiebung auf deutsche Titel
Hallo, ich habe bemerkt, dass du diverse Seiten (DE:Help:Contents, DE:Road signs in Germany, DE:Editing Standards and Conventions) auf deutschsprachige Titel verschoben hast. Ich bin selber kein großer Fan von der Lösung, aber unabhängig von der eigenen Meinung würde ich dich bitten, zumindest doppelte Weiterleitungen aufräumen. Hier sind einige liegen geblieben – alles, was eins tiefer verschachtelt ist, also unter "Hilfe (Weiterleitungsseite)" –, was sogar den Hilfe-Link im Navigationsmenü auf der linken Seite betrifft. --Tordanik 11:02, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
- Hi, ja hast recht, mir war das Problem mit den doppelten Weiterleitungen auch erst zu spät aufgefallen und wolte daraufhin auch nochmal alle durchgehen. Schön wär natürlich auch ne SpecialPage die diese doppelten redirects anzeigen könnte..(edit:ech gibts ja doch) Welches allgemeine Problem hast du mit dem eindeutschen? Würde mich interessieren. --Hakuch (talk) 17:54, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
- Hab gesehen dass du jetzt einiges gefixt hast, danke dafür! Nachdem ich etwas darüber nachgedacht habe, habe ich festgestellt, dass ich keine wirklich überzeugenden Gründe habe. Mir missfällt eben gefühlsmäßig, dass es eben keine technisch saubere Lösung ist, sondern eher ein Hack mit den Weiterleitungen. Weil die Weiterleitung angezeigt wird, bekommt der Leser sogar mit, dass da irgendetwas seltsames im Hintergrund passiert. Natürlich haben wir ohne die Kooperation der Admins nicht wirklich die Möglichkeit, es besser zu machen; von daher sehe ich ein, dass es kein gutes Argument ist. --Tordanik 16:57, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
- Ja toll find ich die Lösung auch nicht wirklich. Aber schon noch besser als diese englischen Titel bei den deutschen Seiten, hat mich schon ziemlich genervt und war etwas das man endlich mal ändern konnte. Bei den ganzen anderen Sachen die mich vor allem in Hinblick auf die Sprachen nerven kann man ja nicht so leicht was ändern...Hakuch (talk) 20:17, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
Test
Ebene 0 Hakuch (talk) 12:57, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
- Ebene 1a Hakuch (talk) 12:57, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
- Ebene 1b Hakuch (talk) 12:57, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
- Ebene 1c Hakuch (talk) 12:57, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
Missing file information
Hello! And thanks for your upload - but some extra info is necessary.
Sorry for bothering you about this, but it is important to know source of the uploaded files.
Are you the author of image File:131795.jpg ?
Or is it copied from some other place (which one?)?
Please, add this info to the file page - something like "I took this photo" or "downloaded from -website link-" or "I took this screeshot of program XYZ".
Doing this would be already very useful.
Licensing - photos
In case that you are the author of the image: Would you agree to open licensing of this image, allowing its use by anyone (similarly to your OSM edits)?
In case where it is a photo you (except relatively rare cases) author can make it available under a specific free license.
Would you be OK with CC0 (it allows use without attribution or any other requirement)?
Or do you prefer to require attribution and some other things using CC-BY-SA-4.0?
If you are the author: Please add {{CC0-self}} to the file page to publish the image under CC0 license.
You can also use {{CC-BY-SA-4.0-self}} to publish under CC-BY-SA-4.0 license.
Once you add missing data - please remove {{Unknown|subcategory=uploader notified February 2022}} from the file page.
Licensing - other images
If it is not a photo situation gets a bit more complicated.
See Drafts/Media file license chart that may help.
note: if you took screenshot of program made by someone else, screenshot of OSM editor with aerial imagery: then licensing of that elements also matter and you are not a sole author.
note: If you downloaded image made by someone else then you are NOT the author.
Note that in cases where photo is a screenshot of some software interface: usually it is needed to handle also copyright of software itself.
Note that in cases where aerial imagery is present: also licensing of an aerial imagery matter.
Help
Feel free to ask for help if you need it - you can do it for example by asking on Talk:Wiki: new topic.
Please ask there if you are not sure what is the proper next step. Especially when you are uploading files that are not your own work or are derivative work (screenshots, composition of images, using aerial imagery etc).
If you are interested in wider discussion about handling licencing at OSM Wiki, see this thread.
--Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 22:34, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
Missing file information
Hello! And thanks for your upload - but some extra info is necessary.
Sorry for bothering you about this, but it is important to know source of the uploaded files.
Are you the author of image File:131796.jpg ?
Or is it copied from some other place (which one?)?
Please, add this info to the file page - something like "I took this photo" or "downloaded from -website link-" or "I took this screeshot of program XYZ".
Doing this would be already very useful.
Licensing - photos
In case that you are the author of the image: Would you agree to open licensing of this image, allowing its use by anyone (similarly to your OSM edits)?
In case where it is a photo you (except relatively rare cases) author can make it available under a specific free license.
Would you be OK with CC0 (it allows use without attribution or any other requirement)?
Or do you prefer to require attribution and some other things using CC-BY-SA-4.0?
If you are the author: Please add {{CC0-self}} to the file page to publish the image under CC0 license.
You can also use {{CC-BY-SA-4.0-self}} to publish under CC-BY-SA-4.0 license.
Once you add missing data - please remove {{Unknown|subcategory=uploader notified February 2022}} from the file page.
Licensing - other images
If it is not a photo situation gets a bit more complicated.
See Drafts/Media file license chart that may help.
note: if you took screenshot of program made by someone else, screenshot of OSM editor with aerial imagery: then licensing of that elements also matter and you are not a sole author.
note: If you downloaded image made by someone else then you are NOT the author.
Note that in cases where photo is a screenshot of some software interface: usually it is needed to handle also copyright of software itself.
Note that in cases where aerial imagery is present: also licensing of an aerial imagery matter.
Help
Feel free to ask for help if you need it - you can do it for example by asking on Talk:Wiki: new topic.
Please ask there if you are not sure what is the proper next step. Especially when you are uploading files that are not your own work or are derivative work (screenshots, composition of images, using aerial imagery etc).
If you are interested in wider discussion about handling licencing at OSM Wiki, see this thread.
--Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 23:48, 1 February 2022 (UTC)