User talk:Hjart

Residential

That is not a good idea, because a village contains more than residential. It contains also commercial, industrial and others. It makes sense, to use a area instead of a node, but using residential and name=<village_name> is no good idea. --MeastroGlanz (talk) 20:07, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Lots of hamlets & villages are pretty much all residential and in these cases it makes perfect sense to put landuse=residential, place=* & name on the same polygon. --Hjart (talk) 20:14, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Streets are a different landuse though. landuse=highway. As soon as you split the polygons into smaller ones to exclude the roads, you will also start noting more different landuses ;-) --Dieterdreist (talk) 14:38, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Signing comments on talk pages

Just in case you didn't know it: simply add --~~~~ after your comment to get a signature. --Dieterdreist (talk) 14:38, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

I do know it. I've just been forgetting it a lot lately (in other wikis too). Sorry about that --Hjart (talk) 14:58, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

and again (BTW I was about to forget to sign my own modification after signing yours in your name ;-)). --Nospam2005 (talk) 19:25, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Where? I think I didn't touch any talk pages for quite some time --Hjart (talk) 19:34, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Talk:Proposed_features/place_areas, yes it's an old modification but recently commented. --Nospam2005 (talk) 19:39, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

aerodrome extermination

I made initial run and found 478 cases. List is at https://gist.github.com/matkoniecz/23bd62764cac4ed81984bb1f8af52dc8

Do you have plans for further actions or do you need help in contacting DWG? Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 12:16, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Avråde at koble landuse-noder til highways

Hej Jeg så din ændring her: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Multipolygon_Examples&type=revision&diff=1604324&oldid=1551764 I stykket hvor du ændrede står det:

Remark: the usage of highways (linear element) as boundaries (multipolygon or not) for landuse (area element) is basically discouraged. This because later shifting, nudging or reshaping the highway or area immediately results in the not often intended change of the connected area resp. highway.

Det er jeg meget enig i. Hele centrum i byen jeg bor i har landuse koblet til vejene og det er en pine at i JOSM forsøge at markere vejene. I iD er det meget nemmere, men der får man ikke fat i landuse-området overhovedet. Er dette et udbredt fenomen i DK? (Sundsvall, den nærmeste større sydlige by er mappet meget bedre af sendelbach)--PangoSE (talk) 08:28, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

Jeg tilføjede teksten efter din "quote" :-). Jeg har i årevis aktivt skilt landuse fra vejnettet i DK + plus bedt andre om at undgå at lade områder dele noder med vejnettet, så det er meget begrænset hvad man nu om kan se af den slags i DK. Det er meget værre i Sverige og dele af Tyskland. Bemærk at du i JOSM kan bruge filtre (omend det kræver nogen øvelse) til at skjule f.eks. landuse på samme måde som i iD.--Hjart (talk) 19:09, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

Eksplicit overflade-specification?

Hej Hjart

Jeg ved ikke om dette er den rette kanal (irc://irc.oftc.net #osm-dk ser ud til at være helt forladt).

Jeg så at du har lavet nogle ændringer i Alnor (Gråsten) sidste efterår. https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/54.90659/9.58307

Bør "surface" være sat for alle "highway = residential"? F.eks. "surface = asphalt" eller "surface = gravel".

Jeg var ude at cykle i går, observerede at Lassensvej er en grusvej og Trapgade asfalteret, og ændrede/tilføjede det siden i OpenStreetMap vha. Merkaartor.

--Mortense (talk) 16:16, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

Jeg har desværre ikke været på irc de seneste måneder og det er fint nok at spørge her. Bemærk dog at du også kan kommentere direkte på changesets (f.eks. dit egen her. Jeg vil også anbefale at starte med iD, eftersom Merkaartor ikke er blevet udviklet på de seneste år.

Det er en rigtig god ide at angive "surface", da de forskellige navigationsprogrammer, der bruger vores data, så vil kunne bruge det i deres beregninger. De fleste veje i området er tegnet op efter luftfotos, hvor det mange steder kan være vanskeligt at se forskel på grus & asfalt og derfor har vi undladt at tilføje surface, så det er super hvis du vil gøre det.

Jeg så iøvrigt godt du redigerede og jeg lavede selv nogen ændringer i området umiddelbart efter :-) --Hjart (talk) 16:45, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

OK, jeg vil ved lejlighed gå i gang med en større omgang "asfaltering" i Gråsten og omegn :-) (Og kigge på "iD".) --Mortense (talk) 15:05, 5 March 2019 (UTC)