User talk:Osm@floris.nu

Hey Florisje... Als ik het goed zag had jij een stuk groene-hart fietsknooppuntennetwerk per abuis hernoemd naar Braassemermeerroute. Ik heb dat weer hersteld, geen probleem, Groetjes, GercoKees 06:29, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Hallo Floris,
Kan jij de flyer die jij in 2008 hebt gemaakt/gedrukt ook online zetten? Kan kan deze makkelijk uitgeprint en verspreid worden.
Gr,
Quint

• Eigenlijk vind ik dat er een nieuwe versie moet worden gemaakt, ik ben helemaal niet tevreden met de tekst. Het is ook geen PSD ofzo dus veel hulp zul je er niet aan hebben. Ik heb er overigens nog best veel dus als je een stapeltje hebben wilt, geen probleem.

Osm@floris.nu 19:12, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

ODBL

Hello. Can you tell me or do you know if the “virtual user” 3dShapes can relicense his commits to the ODBL license? Wicking 15:07, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

Not really involved, I just documented a bit. I'll ask around on the talk-nl mailing list Osm@floris.nu 11:34, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Ok, thank you. Please tell me the answer. My username on OSM is “wicking”, same as in the wiki. Wicking 12:08, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Missing file information

Hello! And thanks for your upload - but some extra info is necessary.

Sorry for bothering you about this, but it is important to know source of the uploaded files.

Are you the author of image File:22maart.png ?

Or is it copied from some other place (which one?)?

Please, add this info to the file page - something like "I took this photo" or "downloaded from -website link-".

In case that you are the author of the photo: Would you agree to open licensing of this image, allowing its use by anyone (similarly to your OSM edits)?

Would you be OK with CC0 (it allows use without attribution or any other requirement)?

Or do you prefer to require attribution and some other things using CC-BY-SA-4.0?

If you are the author: Please add <nowiki>{{CC0-self}}</nowiki> to the file page to publish the image under CC0 license.

You can also use <nowiki>{{CC-BY-SA-4.0-self}}</nowiki> to publish under CC-BY-SA-4.0 license.

Feel free to ask for help if you need it - you can do it for example by asking on [[Talk:Wiki]]: new topic.

Please ask there if you are not sure what is the proper next step or when you are uploading files that are not your own work. --Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 17:59, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

I’m fairly sure I made that image, I think there was a procedure described somewhere and i followed that just to provide and update. But since it doesn’t seem to be used anywhere, just delete it. Floris (talk) 18:54, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Marked for a deletion, thanks for a quick reply Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 20:06, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Missing file information

Hello! And thanks for your upload - but some extra info is necessary.

Sorry for bothering you about this, but it is important to know source of the uploaded files, in this case File:Dutch openstreetmap flyer.jpg

As you are the author of the image: Would you agree to open licensing of this image, allowing its use by anyone (similarly to your OSM edits)?

In case where it is a photo you (except relatively rare cases) author can make it available under a specific free license.

Would you be OK with CC0 (it allows use without attribution or any other requirement)?

Or do you prefer to require attribution and some other things using CC-BY-SA-4.0?

If you are the author: Please add {{CC0-self}} to the file page to publish the image under CC0 license.

You can also use {{CC-BY-SA-4.0-self}} to publish under CC-BY-SA-4.0 license.

Once you add missing data - please remove {{Unknown|subcategory=uploader notified March 2022}} from the file page.

Help

Feel free to ask for help if you need it - you can do it for example by asking on Talk:Wiki: new topic.

Please ask there if you are not sure what is the proper next step. Especially when you are uploading files that are not your own work or are derivative work (screenshots, composition of images, using aerial imagery etc).

If you are interested in wider discussion about handling licencing at OSM Wiki, see this thread.

(sorry if I missed something that already states license and source: I am looking through over 20 000 files and fixing obvious cases on my own, in other I ask people who upladed files, but it is possible that I missed something - in such case also please answer)

--Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 21:44, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

Missing file information

Hello! And thanks for your upload - but some extra info is necessary.

Sorry for bothering you about this, but it is important to know source of the uploaded files.

Are you the creator of image File:Groenehart rcn sign.jpg ?

Or is it copied from some other place (which one?)?

Please, add this info to the file page - something like "I took this photo" or "downloaded from -website link-" or "I took this screeshot of program XYZ" or "this is map generated from OpenStreetMap data and SRTM data" or "map generated from OSM data and only OSM data" or "This is my work based on file -link-to-page-with-that-file-and-its-licensing-info-" or "used file downloaded from internet to create it, no idea which one".

Doing this would be already very useful.

Licensing - photos

In case that you are the author of the image: Would you agree to open licensing of this image, allowing its use by anyone (similarly to your OSM edits)?

In case where it is a photo you (except relatively rare cases) author can make it available under a specific free license.

Would you be OK with CC0 (it allows use without attribution or any other requirement)?

Or do you prefer to require attribution and some other things using CC-BY-SA-4.0?

If you are the author: Please add {{CC0-self}} to the file page to publish the image under CC0 license.

You can also use {{CC-BY-SA-4.0-self|Osm@floris.nu}} to publish under CC-BY-SA-4.0 license.

Once you add missing data - please remove {{Unknown|subcategory=uploader notified 2022, June}} from the file page.

Licensing - other images

If it is not a photo situation gets a bit more complicated.

See Drafts/Media file license chart that may help.

note: if you took screenshot of program made by someone else, screenshot of OSM editor with aerial imagery: then licensing of that elements also matter and you are not a sole author.

note: If you downloaded image made by someone else then you are NOT the author.

Note that in cases where photo is a screenshot of some software interface: usually it is needed to handle also copyright of software itself.

Note that in cases where aerial imagery is present: also licensing of an aerial imagery matter.

Help

Feel free to ask for help if you need it - you can do it for example by asking on Talk:Wiki: new topic.

Please ask there if you are not sure what is the proper next step. Especially when you are uploading files that are not your own work or are derivative work (screenshots, composition of images, using aerial imagery etc).

If you are interested in wider discussion about handling licencing at OSM Wiki, see this thread.

(sorry if I missed something that already states license and source: I am looking through over 20 000 files and fixing obvious cases on my own, in other I ask people who upladed files, but it is possible that I missed something - in such case also please answer)

--Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 19:02, 4 June 2022 (UTC)