Talk:Properties
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
"Properties" is too generic?
No it is not. Some properties apply to many keys ... eg disused can be applied to buildings, highways, landuse. Warin61 (talk) 08:16, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
- Both of you are right. The problem is, this table is unmaintainable and will always be out of date. We should work with categories here. I also propose to add an information "isProperty"/"isFeature" to Template:ValueDescription/Template:KeyDescription--Jojo4u (talk) 11:32, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
- Any manual table can be rewritten with appropriate extension like https://semantic-mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Outline_format
- Again, you can use https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:CategoryTree to display content like this:
- https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:Category#Visualizing_category_tree Xxzme (talk) 12:12, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
- On the other hand we already have the group "properties" on the key/value templates.--Jojo4u (talk) 14:09, 4 September 2015 (UTC)