User talk:CBRS
Hey, I just want to notice you that you should format a wiki page so well that there's no such unnecessary things in the content list like 5.2.2.64 in Pennsylvania wikipage (64th element of 5.2.2) :) Cheers. P.S. Also, check out OSMUS Slack Ottwiz (talk)
Why you deleted this?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Contributors&curid=30655&diff=2207653&oldid=2205309 Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 05:44, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
- Because it was an old OCTO disclaimer from 8 to 10 years ago, which has been abandoned since long ago. The latest can be found at https://dc.gov/node/939602, which can also be found at http://data.dc.gov/. It is never a good practice to copy and paste disclaimer. Users should be directed to the data publisher's page to view them. --CBRS (talk) 13:09, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Please don't remove the use of Template:JOSM_Icon in favor of duplicate icons you upload
Hi, I noticed you did a few edits like this one: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=JOSM/Guide&diff=prev&oldid=2072919. As per File_talk:JOSM-Icon-download.png it seems that was done in good faith as the download icon had been outdated at that point.
However, please know the JOSM-Icon-... files are meant to be updated in-place with any updates JOSM do to their icon base; that includes their progressive migration to SVG. The JOSM_Icon template is able to pick up image updates automatically, and prefers an SVG version if it exists; the idea being to remove all existing duplicates in Category:JOSM-Icon and replace all direct uses with {{JOSM Icon|something}} (for a bunch of reasons, auto-SVGing being one).
I already uploaded the new download icon before noticing your changes; I will therefore revert your edits and ask for File:JOSM Download Icon.svg to be deleted
