Proposal:Monitoring station

From OpenStreetMap Wiki
Revision as of 17:49, 14 November 2013 by Malenki (talk | contribs) (approved)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
monitoring station - Tag:man_made=monitoring_station
Proposal status: Approved (active)
Proposed by: Grossing, Delta foxtrot2, Malenki
Tagging: man_made=monitoring_station
Applies to: node, way, area, relation
Definition: For all objects measuring/monitoring sea-, river- or snow levels, air pollution, weather, seismic activity and so on
Statistics:

Rendered as: free text
Draft started: 2010-05-20
RFC start: 2010-05-20
Vote start: 2013-10-30
Vote end: 2013-11-13


Public-images-osm logo.svg man_made = monitoring_station
An Air Quality Monitoring Station above the M42 - geograph.org.uk - 210181.jpg
Description
A station that monitors something. Show/edit corresponding data item.
Group: man made
Used on these elements
may be used on nodesmay be used on waysmay be used on areas (and multipolygon relations)may be used on relations
Useful combination
  • monitoring:water_level
  • monitoring:tide_gauge
  • monitoring:weather
  • monitoring:air_quality
  • monitoring:noise
  • monitoring:traffic
  • monitoring:seismic_activity
  • monitoring:gps
  • monitoring:glonass
Status: approvedPage for proposal

History of this Proposal

At the moment there exist:
Proposal: man_made=measurement_station
Tag (without Proposal) man_made=monitoring_station
Both for mapping the same kind of objects.
After 3.5 years of coexisting there should be finally a clean-up.

The proposal for man_made=measurement_station was created on 2nd April 2010 by German user grossing and malenki pushing him a little. Since in German language a lot of stuff regarding weather gets "gemessen" so "measured" sounded the best pick.

The tag page man_made=monitoring_station was created on 20th May 2010 by User:Delta foxtrot2, its evolution is explained on its talk page.

Since both measurement_station and monitoring_station exist since 3.5 years I think we can skip/end the rfc now and start voting.
After this proposal is done, objects tagged with man_made=measurement_stations will be changed into man_made=monitoring_station since both tags were invented for one destination.

Some facts

  • For monitoring_station there also exist a Portuguese and a Russian translation.
  • Occurence in the wiki of

monitoring_station: 453
https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Awiki.openstreetmap.org%2F+monitoring_station
measurement_station: 47 (as of 2013-10-31; now changing them to monitoring_station)
https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Awiki.openstreetmap.org%2F+measurement_station

  • amount of measurement_stations in OSM:
  • amount of monitoring_stations in OSM:


See also

Monitoring Stations

(Here the real proposal starts)
There is a large variety of monitoring stations. It ranges from checking water levels in rivers (Wikipedia (de) Wikipedia (en) ), tide gauges for sea level monitoring, noise monitoring, air pollution monitoring and signals from positioning satellite monitoring to weather stations (Wikipedia (de) Wikipedia (en)).

Rationale

man_made=monitoring_station creates a simple feature that would enable to map all the above features. The tags can be applied to all types of objects existing in OSM.
This tag doesn't refer to objects used to "monitor" - that means intercept, eavesdrop or wiretap - any communication infrastructure.

Tagging

Required

Define what is monitored:

  • monitoring:water_level=* -- Site used to monitor the non-tidal water levels in rivers, streams and lakes. (Change for this proposal to the multi usable monitoring:water_level from monitoring:river_level)
  • monitoring:tide_gauge=* -- Site used to monitor the tide level of the sea.
  • monitoring:weather=* -- Site used to monitor the weather.
  • monitoring:air_quality=* -- Site used to monitor air quality due to man made pollution or natural pollen levels.
  • monitoring:noise=* -- Site used to monitor noise levels.
  • monitoring:traffic=* -- Site used to monitor traffic.
  • monitoring:seismic_activity=* -- Site used to monitor seismic activity.
  • monitoring:gps=* -- Site used to monitor signals from the GPS satellite cluster.
  • monitoring:glonass=* -- Site used to monitor signals from the GLONASS satellite cluster.
  • monitoring:*=* -- feel also free to use other tags since there are a lot of other things to monitor like temperature, height and density of snow, speed of glaciers and so on.

Secondary

No defaults are defined here since depending on the type of station, the operator and the things monitored it is impossible to define an always correct default value.

Useful combinations

Example images

flood gauge at Murrumbidgee River
flood gauge at Murrumbidgee River
A technician examines a weather station's anemometer.
Remote GPS monitoring site.

See also

Voting

  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. Since I worked on it I approve it, of course. :) -- malenki 23:04, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. I'm glad you launched the vote as the situation with these two tags for the same thing is absurd. Time to choose one of them, this one looks good and if there's a consensus about it we will be able to fix this JOSM ticket by deprecating the older one. --Don-vip (talk) 01:28, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. Thanks to Don-Vip for putting a note in josm bug tracker. Most of the time measurments are taken stationary and periodically, so I prefer monitoring since it indicates the progress made over time and for the simpler fact that its string is a little shorter, this matters esp. when it's used as a namespace prefix, like it is in this proposal. So I approve it over the other. --Cmuelle8 (talk) 01:55, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. MHohmann (talk) 05:27, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. Not a big thing, but a nice improvement. --EvanE (talk) 06:14, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. Thanks for documentation and cleanup - that's always welcome. --Imagic (talk) 07:55, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. Janko (talk) 10:03, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. nice clean up and logical structure --Hedaja (talk) 11:54, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. Logical structure N76 (talk) 14:59, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. Thanks for your work on this --Escada (talk) 16:20, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. Finally... --Hofoen (talk) 18:15, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. Thanks for cleanup. --Werner2101 (talk) 18:17, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. good cleanup --Farad (talk) 10:34, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --Lyx (talk) 23:30, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. Bigfatfrog67 (talk) 18:32, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --M!dgard (talk) 20:09, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --Nebulon42 (talk) 10:47, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. -- Al3xius (talk) 18:12, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. -- HillWithSmallFields (talk) 15:32, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --vsandre (talk) 07:46, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --polderrunner (talk) 08:48, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. -- Ogmios (talk) 09:00, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --Gormo (talk) 10:15, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --Species 10:35, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --4rch (talk) 13:23, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --Thomas8122 (talk) 15:42, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --ubahnverleih (talk) 16:22, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --Scai (talk) 21:07, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. Makes sense --BCNorwich 9 November 2013
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --ToniE (talk) 16:04, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --msdess 11 November 2013
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --Dieterdreist (talk) 14:38, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
  • I approve this proposal I approve this proposal. --Brycenesbitt (talk) 07:24, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Related terms: ‹ monitoring station ›